Priests shouldn’t engage in partisan politics—except?
Bishop Michael Warfel of Great Falls-Billings has reprimanded four priests who appeared in clerical collars, as VIP guests, at a rally for President Trump in Montana. And rightly so, because priests should not take part in partisan political activities.
At the same time, Cardinal Blase Cupich has enthusiastically backed a demonstration led by Father Michael Pfleger, which blocked traffic on a major highway in Chicago.
It’s true that Father Pfleger’s demonstration was not organized to support any specific political candidate (although it was certainly intended to make some politicians squirm). But is that really the crucial difference?
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: feedback -
Jul. 13, 2018 12:33 AM ET USA
Cupich went to meet with Obama less than a week after he was installed in Chicago.
Posted by: thomas28899 -
Jul. 12, 2018 8:50 AM ET USA
It seems to me that Pope Francis is willing to be quite political, why can't priests do the same?
Posted by: mary_conces3421 -
Jul. 10, 2018 6:49 PM ET USA
As I understand it, (& I’m no expert) priests are forbidden canonically to hold political office and legally & prudentially to back a particular candidate or party from the pulpit. I know you’re mainly pointing out a double standard, And I’ve wished for years that Fr. Pfleger would be quiet. Nevertheless, I think priests should be allowed free speech out of the pulpit.So much is political now. Even an anti-abortion rally.