Caught: one red herring
A report in the Buenos Aires Times on the trial of Bishops Zanchetta concludes this way:
Notice anything peculiar about that sentence? We are all sadly aware of the scandals. But suppose I were to rewrite the conclusion slightly, so that it read:
The Buenos Aires Times does not actually say that priestly celibacy is a factor in sexual abuse. That argument is difficult to defend, since plenty of non-clerical abusers are married. But by casually mentioning celibacy, in a sentence where it does not belong, the paper can plant the idea without any need to defend it.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!