The enduring problem with Canon 401-2
Today the Vatican news service announced that two more bishops have resigned, citing #401-2 of the Code of Canon Law. That canon, as knowledgeable Catholics now know, stipulates that the Pope may accept the resignation of a bishop who is unfit to continue with his duties because of illness or “some other grave reason.”
Here’s the problem: If these two bishops (one in Germany, the other in Colombia) are seriously ill, we owe them our sympathy and our prayers for their recovery. Unfortunately there is that other possible explanation. For years now we have seen the same canon 401-2 invoked to explain the resignations of bishops who have departed in disgrace after some personal scandal. The terse Vatican announcements never distinguish between the bishops who are forced out because of gross misconduct and those who are genuinely ill. That’s a disservice to the prelates whose weaknesses are merely physical.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: [email protected] -
Oct. 09, 2018 12:27 AM ET USA
Another agenda for silencing the brave by threats of destruction by the Vatican. The means the Pope used to take over Knights was despicable. The lavender mafia was active. More dirt pushed under the rug. Watch the mafia start to come after Archbishop Vigano. His trial like Justice Kavanaugph is about to begin. Watch the hyenas attack with every twisted story and lie. This will not build trust. St Michael and Mary help us.
Posted by: filioque -
Oct. 05, 2018 5:40 PM ET USA
And don't forget about the $30 million in the Swiss trust. Did the Pope bring that back in the diplomatic pouch?
Posted by: demark8616 -
Aug. 05, 2012 12:02 PM ET USA
I get your point. Yes, it is hard on those bishops that resign due to illness or another reason. To utilize this canon for such different reasons is bound to cast a slur of sorts on those innocent of gross misconduct. I'm sure they include mental/emotional reasons too, not just physical? So, it is possible that there is not such a marked degree of disservice taking place here. It is probably also done in this way so as to protect the reputation of those 'asked to resign' because of misconduct.