By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | Apr 08, 2003
A remarkable number of my sincere Catholic friends think that the Globe won its Pulitzer by leading an anti-Catholic conspiracy in the media.
The Globe is anti-Catholic. But the facts of the sex-abuse scandal were not produced by a conspiracy-- or at least not the sort of conspiracy my friends have in mind.
Facts are facts. Their authenticity does not depend upon the motivations of those who uncover them. The Globe did a masterful job-- admittedly, with an indispensable assist from Judge Sweeney-- in laying out the facts.
But good journalism consists in something more than laying out the facts. Journalists are supposed to ask and answer the questions: who, what, where, when, and why. The Globe has answered the first 4 questions regarding the sex-abuse scandal. But why did it all happen?
Why did so many clerics betray their trust, their duty, their vocation, their faith? What did they gain by sheltering predators? What would they have lost by doing the right thing? Answer those questions, and you'll understand the crisis in the Church. But there's no Pulitzer waiting for the journalists who crack that story.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!