... and then there’s the archbishop who won’t resign
By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | May 28, 2018
While thirty Chilean bishops have submitted their resignation after being accused of covering up sexual abuse, Archbishop Philip Wilson of Adelaide, Australia, has not resigned after being convicted in a court of law of the same offense.
|Free eBook: Liturgical Year 2022-2023, Vol. 1|
Following his conviction, Archbishop Wilson said that he would step down from his position, leaving his vicar general in charge of the archdiocese, but would not resign. “He’s standing aside until process has run its course,” said an archdiocesan spokesman, whereas a resignation would be “forever.” The “process” in this case could mean either an appeal of the verdict or a prison sentence of up to two years.
Archbishop Wilson insists that he is innocent of the charges. So perhaps it is not unreasonable that he hopes to resume his duties after winning an appeal. But in this case, there’s more to the story.
At the age of 67, Archbishop Wilson is well short of the ordinary retirement age for Catholic prelates. But some bishops retire early because of health issues, and he could easily fit into that category. Last November, the archbishop’s lawyers asked for a postponement of his trial, because he was recovering from surgery to have a pacemaker installed. Of course many men have remained productive and vigorous for years after successful pacemaker surgery. But again, there’s more to the story. His lawyers also suggested that the archbishop might not be able to testify because of the effects of Alzeheimer’s disease.
Heart trouble. Alzheimer’s. A criminal conviction. Any one would be reason enough for a bishop’s resignation. Together, it’s overwhelming.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!