Synod’s canonical commission calls for diocesan synods, provincial councils every 10 years, ‘complete revision’ of Code of Canon Law
October 01, 2026
A canonical commission established by Pope Francis proposed changes to 34 canons of the Code of Canon Law in light of the Final Document of the 2021-2024 synod on synodality.
“In the long term, however, there is an obvious need for a complete revision of the two Codes to reflect the theological and ecclesiological issues that have emerged,” the commission, referring to the Code of Canon Law (1983) and the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (1990), stated in its final report.
The ten-member commission, established in 2023, was formed to assist the General Secretariat of the Synod. The commission’s coordinator was Archbishop Filippo Iannone, O.Carm., the prefect of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts at the time of the commission’s establishment, and now prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops.
In releasing the commission’s final report, Cardinal Mario Grech, the synod’s secretary-general, said that “while the whole Church is engaged in theological and ecclesiological reflection on her synodal nature, it seemed important to initiate a corresponding reflection on the norms—the canons—that govern her organization and the relationships among her members.”
“The same reflection will also extend to the law of the Eastern Catholic Churches, for which a specific commission has recently been established,” Cardinal Grech added. “Without corresponding canon law, theology would remain incomplete, ‘like a man with only one arm,’ as Pope Leo XIII once recalled.”
In summarizing the proposed changes to the Code of Canon Law, the General Secretariat of the Synod stated:
The first part of the document contains proposals to amend the canons of the Code concerning the possibility for the lay faithful, both men and women, to exercise in the Church those offices, functions and ministries for which they are suitably qualified and competent, including within the sphere of ecclesial governance.
The second part proposes the revision, from a synodal perspective, of certain canons concerning Particular Councils and Episcopal Conferences, namely those ecclesial bodies entrusted with fostering collaboration among the local Churches.
Finally, the third part addresses participatory bodies as already established in the Code, while proposing amendments aimed at strengthening their participatory dimension and missionary orientation.
Like the Final Reports of the Study Groups, the present Report is to be considered a working document.
In perhaps the most significant proposals, the canonical commission called for diocesan synods to be held in every diocese “at least every ten years,” and provincial councils to be held in every ecclesiastical province every ten years. Ecclesiastical provinces are groups of dioceses in which a metropolitan archbishop has precedence.
Under the current wording of the Canon 446, acts of a provincial council may not be promulgated until the Apostolic See has reviewed them. The canonical commission offered two alternative proposed changes to the process.
Under the first proposed change, the Apostolic See must review the acts of a provincial council within a year and decide whether they may be promulgated. Under the alternative proposed wording, silence from the Vatican betokens consent: “if the Apostolic See does not respond within one year, the decrees can be promulgated.”
For all current news, visit our News home page.
Further information:
- Canonical Commission: Final Report (General Secretariat of the Synod, 9/22/26)
- Proposed amendments to canons concerning Ecclesial Governance, Participation of the faithful and Accountability (General Secretariat of the Synod, 9/29/26)
- Final report of Synod's canon law commission published (Vatican News, 9/30/26)
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: Thia1301 -
Oct. 02, 2026 10:33 PM ET USA
What have these meetings accomplished? Oh, they’ve identified a need for more meetings! This work of going to meetings must be of great importance…but have they produced a single disciple for Christ?
-
Posted by: tmschroeder2790 -
Oct. 02, 2026 8:34 PM ET USA
This is a glorious mess. Images of wet index fingers in the breeze comes to mind.
-
Posted by: ginnyfree -
Oct. 02, 2026 12:55 PM ET USA
So, what happens if the Sancta Sede is vacant and no response is made to the Proposals offered by a Provincial Council of laity or a combo of laity and prelates? Automatic acceptance to the Proposals? Is that wise? Wisdom is needed here. By passing the Pope and his men?
-
Posted by: frjimt.stjudes7938 -
Oct. 02, 2026 8:26 AM ET USA
This is the Church that since the late 60's is always trying to imitate the business world, it's just 20 yrs behind the "been there, done that" movement...
-
Posted by: dsmodaro2424889 -
Oct. 01, 2026 10:41 PM ET USA
While this is only a working document it allows the camel to get its nose under the tent in areas of theology changes with or without the Vatican intervening. The timeline of the synodal process is unrolling itself very succinctly, and if I may add without shame.
-
Posted by: Crusader -
Oct. 01, 2026 3:18 PM ET USA
Well, I am concerned by the proposal to change 34 items in canon law due to who is proposing the changes. One of the proposals is to increase laity in charge, and we know what kind of laity would be selected. I am reminded of the Bill Buckley quote that "I would rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the Boston telephone directory than by the 2,000 people on the faculty of Harvard University." I think there is an analogy there.
-
Posted by: feedback -
Oct. 01, 2026 12:15 PM ET USA
The first proposal; to open possibility of ecclesial governance to laity is a house of cards and a can of worms. The current Can. 212 §1 states: "The Christian faithful are bound to follow with Christian obedience those things which the sacred pastors, inasmuch as they represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or establish as rulers of the Church." Who would be obliged to religiously obey a non ordained individual, no matter how "suitably qualified and competent"?


