2 states prevented from funding abortion in new health insurance pools
July 16, 2010
Following an outcry from pro-life advocates, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced on July 14 that it would exclude abortion coverage from the new federally-funded high-risk health insurance pools. The wording of President Barack Obama’s March executive order barring federal funding of most abortions in health insurance exchanges did not apply to the new high-risk pools, and had thus originally permitted the federal funding of abortions in Pennsylvania and New Mexico’s new high-risk pool plans, according to the National Right to Life Committee.
Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, chairman of the US bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, issued the following statement on July 15.
This week it was reported that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had approved a new high-risk health insurance program for residents of Pennsylvania that by its terms would cover abortions without meaningful limits. This federal program, established by the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), will provide health services until 2014 to uninsured persons with pre-existing conditions. The Pennsylvania plan, while purporting not to fund “elective” abortions, made clear in its text that all abortions that satisfy the requirements of certain Pennsylvania statutes (i.e., all abortions that are not illegal in that state) would be covered, and reimbursed, with a combination of private premiums and federal funds drawn from the U.S. Treasury. This first announcement that $160 million in federal funds would be used to provide pro-abortion coverage raised an alarming precedent. Later the news also became public that the state of New Mexico would be covering “elective abortions” in its federal high-risk pool, which was already accepting enrollees.
Last night, however, HHS reacted to public criticisms by announcing that it will act to exclude abortion from this federally funded program, in accord with the assurances that Secretary Sebelius and President Obama have repeatedly made that PPACA will not be used to promote abortion. We welcome this new policy, while continuing to be gravely concerned that it was not issued until after some states had announced that pro-abortion health plans were approved and had begun to enroll patients. This situation illustrates once again the need for Congress to enact legislation clearly stating once and for all that funds appropriated by PPACA will not pay for abortions or for insurance coverage that includes abortion. Such legislation would mirror the Hyde amendment and similar provisions which prevent such abortion funding in all other federal health programs.
In this program as in others, the issue of government involvement in the taking of innocent human life should not remain subject to the changeable discretion of executive officials or depend on the continued vigilance of pro-life advocates. It is vitally important for people with serious medical conditions who have been unable to obtain coverage to receive the help offered by programs such as this – and for them to be assured that their coverage will be life-affirming, not life-threatening.
For all current news, visit our News home page.
- Pro-Life Chair Welcomes HHS Exclusion of Abortion from Federal Insurance Program, Calls For Permanent Law (USCCB)
- HHS Moves to Block Abortion Funding in High-Risk Pools Following Controversy (LifeSiteNews.com)
- Obama Admin First Defends Abortion $ in Health Care, Now Promises None (LifeNews.com)
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Ken -
Jul. 17, 2010 3:03 AM ET USA
And the USCCB played an important role in getting this monstrosity passed by supporting efforts for "comprehensive health care reform" until it became obvious at the very end that abortions would be covered. The fact that they didn't anticipate this (they were dealing with pro-abort Democrats the entire time) says something about the competence of their leadership. The USCCB should be disbanded for a more faithful replacement. Meanwhile, I wonder how the Catholic Medical Association feels now?
Posted by: lauriem5377 -
Jul. 16, 2010 6:27 PM ET USA
Praise God for this decision NOT to fund abortions with taxpayor dollars. However, there is clearly substantial risk to life in the new health care reform legislation that is going to require on-going vigilance and continued work to protect the sanctity of human life!