Lawyers ask tribunal to acquit top 'Vatileaks II' defendants
July 06, 2016
Lawyers for the most prominent defendants in the "Vatileaks II" trial urged the court to acquit their clients, or at least give them minimum sentences, in final statements on July 5.
Laura Soro, representing Francesca Chaouqui-- who was described by prosecutors as the "instigator" of the massive leak of confidential documents-- called for acquittal, saying that there was no conclusive evidence to convict her client. "Francesca Chaouqui isn't likeable," her lawyer said, acknowledging the strongly negative peception of her client. "But you can't convict her just because she's unlikeable, unpleasant, insufferable, arrogant, and presumptuous."
In a separate statement, Emanuela Bellardini, the lawyer for Msgr. Lucio Vallejo Balda, asked the Vatican tribunal to acquit her client for lack of compelling evidence or, if he is found guilty, to impose the minimum sentence in light of "mitigating factors." Msgr. Vallejo Balda has admitted that he made confidential documents available to reporter, but said that he did so under heavy pressure from Chaouqui.
- Information on the final phase of the trial for dissemination of reserved information and documents (Vatican press office)
- Lawyer to Vatican court: Client not likable, but not guilty (AP)
- Prosecutors ask for four convictions, one acquittal in 'Vatileaks' trial (CWN, 7/5)
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!