Action Alert!

To chew on: We were undesirables once.

By Thomas V. Mirus ( bio - articles - email ) | Dec 12, 2015

Most people in the U.S. have no idea of this country's long history of anti-Catholic bigotry. This reached a peak in the nineteenth century, when we were considered to be untrustworthy, loyal to a foreign power and unassimilatable to American culture and values. (If only!)

Kudos, then, to the L.A. Times, which has illuminated a small part of that ugly history for its readership: "A century ago, a popular Missouri newspaper demonized a religious minority: Catholics." The author surely means to draw a parallel to the demonization of Muslim refugees today, though he does not do so explicitly.

More pointed is an excellent essay in The Paris Review by David Griffith, who shows how relevant Flannery O'Connor's short story "The Displaced Person" is for us in the present moral crisis. The story is about a Protestant farm owner who reluctantly takes in Catholic refugees from Poland (which the O'Connors themselves had done when Flannery was a girl). It is a rare example of O'Connor taking on something topical, but no less timeless for that. The following passage from the story reveals a thought process that is easy enough to find in the modern Christian right:

Watching from her vantage point, Mrs. Shortley had the sudden intuition that the Gobblehooks, like rats with typhoid fleas, could have carried all those murderous ways over the water with them directly to this place. If they had come from where that kind of thing was done to them, who was to say they were not the kind that would also do it to others?

Aside from its continued relevance, "The Displaced Person" is simply one of O'Connor's best stories: go ahead and read it in full.

Thomas V. Mirus is Director of Podcasts for, hosts The Catholic Culture Podcast, and co-hosts Criteria: The Catholic Film Podcast. See full bio.

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

  • Posted by: Randal Mandock - Jun. 14, 2016 7:44 AM ET USA

    Oops. Did you mean to say "centrifugal"? Centripetal means a tendency toward the center, as a string holds a revolving ball in its circular path or as gravity holds the moon in its orbit around the earth. Centrifugal, on the other hand, means to recede from the center. I know that your physics professor smacked your fingers with a ruler for using the term "centrifugal," but it's nonetheless a useful concept even if misunderstood. Centrifugal effect is nothing more than Newton's 1st law of motion

  • Posted by: ryanjbrady7689 - Jun. 11, 2016 12:53 PM ET USA

    Soloviev was right: the Orthodox need a pope to unify them. So it seems inconsistent to argue, as Lawler has, that it would be a set-back to ecumenism if they could not unify enough to hold a council. Maybe that would cause them to realize that they need to be united to Rome. True ecumenism has conversion as the end goal and would be directed to encouraging them to unite with us through recognizing the primacy of the pope in both honor and jurisdiction.

  • Posted by: james-w-anderson8230 - Jun. 10, 2016 7:22 PM ET USA

    Great article and I will act on your suggestion to pray.

  • Posted by: AgnesDay - Dec. 14, 2015 3:40 PM ET USA

    I grew up on Flannery O'Connor, ate her up with my daily grits and biscuits. I think the lady would not make a one-to-one correspondence with the Syrian situation. Or did I miss the part about the Holy Father issuing a statement that he was sending the Swiss Guard to the US with the mass migration?