Smaller Church, Bigger Faith 5: Social Services and Universities
I predicted one final installment to this Smaller Church, Bigger Faith series, but I have since thought of a separate penultimate point which should not be passed over. I mean the need to reform the Church’s ancillary institutions, such as her semi-official social service organizations and especially those universities which bear the Catholic name. Over the past fifty years or so, these have given grave scandal to the faithful, leading them to believe that the Church’s moral teachings may be set aside in favor of modern “insights”.
Too many of these organizations have contributed to the bigger Church, smaller faith syndrome which it has been the object of this series to address—the devolution of a Church which constantly gets in its own way, a Church whose members impede the New Evangelization by their own tepidity or worse. Our Lord says He will spew the lukewarm out of His mouth (Rev 3:16). Ought not the Church to seek, at least in some reasonable measure, to combat this lukewarmness, this easy accommodation with worldly patterns, as it is still exhibited by so many social service and university leaders?
Most readers are familiar with the recent efforts of the Vatican to reform and reinvigorate the Church’s social service agencies, beginning perhaps with Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical Deus Caritas Est in 2006. We can also recall the furor over Catholic Relief Services collaborating with organizations which promote contraception, the subsequent change in leadership of that organization, and the advice offered by a number of high-ranking churchmen at general meetings of the CRS leadership.
In various parts of the world, conflicts have also arisen over the placement of children with gay parents by Catholic adoption agencies. Similarly, for several years now there has been an open battle between the American bishops and the Catholic Health Association, headed by Sister Carol Keehan of the Daughters of Charity, a battle which has touched the most central teachings of the Church regarding the sanctity of human life. While progress is undoubtedly being made, and while in this particular case the American bishops have stood firm in their resistance to contraception, sterilization and abortion under Obamacare, the renewal of the Church’s social service agencies has a long way to go.
In many cases these agencies need to learn again how to undertake a distinctively Catholic apostolate instead of relying on secular judgments about what constitutes the good.
Universities and Theology Faculties
In most cases, I believe the social service organizations can be brought into line by the bishops in various places if they have the will to do so. This is less easily done with Catholic universities, however, where the common refusal to uphold Catholic teaching is both more widespread and even more damaging. The secularization of Catholic education in the twentieth century was quite remarkable, including the dominance of Modernism in theological faculties around the Western world. The governance of universities by boards of trustees, often in countries like the United States which typically require such governance for accreditation and the granting of degrees, makes colleges and universities fairly difficult to reform.
There have been three main causes for the departure of the universities from the heart of the Church (recall the title of Pope John Paul II’s landmark instruction for reform, Ex Corde Ecclesiae). The first is the generalized secularization of the Western worldview and the rise of reliance on the natural sciences, which has caused so many other disciplines (philosophy, theology, literature, political theory, history, etc.) to lose both their focus and their confidence in favor of a certain naturalistic reductionism.
As a case in point, I have just begun reading Politicizing the Bible, a scholarly study of the roots of historical biblical criticism by Scott Hahn and Benjamin Wiker. The authors trace back to the fourteenth century an ever-increasing trend toward not only examining the natural aspects of Scripture (the languages, the literary genres, the historical circumstances) but also insisting that only natural interpretations are legitimate, ruling out the supernatural, the miraculous, and even the idea of Providence. In a similar way, the collapse of a Christian vision has changed every subject in academia.
Competition and Modernism
The second major cause has been the felt need of Catholic universities to compete with their secular counterparts, especially in terms of the number of their prize-winning faculty. This led Catholic schools deliberately to dilute themselves by hiring highly-regarded scholars regardless of whether they shared a common mission. In an era in which a secular vision determines what constitutes scholarly achievement throughout the West, and in which false notions of academic freedom protect even the most flighty of rebellions against the Catholic tradition, the deck is stacked against the Faith in every university that bases its development on this false competitive premise.
A case in point here is the University of Notre Dame which, while it still has many wonderful faculty, in fact went down this road in the second half of the twentieth century. This is recounted by, among others, the late Ralph McInerny in his autobiography, fittingly inspired by the Book of Job with the title I Alone Have Escaped to Tell You. In recent years, a running battle between the Bishop of South Bend and the President of Notre Dame over several issues, and also an outcry by many Catholics over the University’s decision to honor President Barack Obama at the very moment he was attacking the principles of the Catholic Church, have thus far gone unresolved.
The third major cause has been the rampant Modernism among the Catholic intelligentsia, starting early in the twentieth century and coming out into the open beginning in the 1960s, especially in religious orders devoted to higher education. One thinks particularly of the Jesuits, who used to provide a great deal of the intellectual leadership of the Church. Thus, under a twofold influence, both academic and priestly, many universities have developed a kind of quasi-official animus against orthodoxy. This has also affected colleges and universities influenced by women religious, particularly in the United States.
The situation is getting slowly better, I think, and of course it varies greatly from school to school and order to order (in general, for example, one can trust the Dominicans). But key Jesuit-run institutions have proven to be hard nuts to crack, with Georgetown University in Washington, DC a prime example of the type. At Georgetown, the dominant ambiance has become decidedly heterodox, both doctrinally and morally. The lived resistance to Catholic teaching on sexuality is hard to miss there, as is the alignment of faculty with political programs which fail to respect the sanctity of human life. In other words, such universities are simply representatives of the dominant culture operating under a religious veneer. An authentic Catholic voice is confined to relatively isolated individual faculty and students.
I had hoped Pope Francis would put himself in a position to address the reform of the Jesuits more forcefully, but in addition to whatever he does behind the scenes, he is thus far continuing his predecessors’ example of gentle pressure and encouragement, stressing the essential ecclesial nature of the Jesuit mission. This was particularly noteworthy in his recent address to the faculties of the Jesuit-run institutes in Rome, in which the Pope emphasized the need to open one’s mind and heart to God in prayer in order to do theology, rather than hardening oneself into fashionable methodologies and schools of thought. The title of his address speaks volumes: Ecclesiastical Universities are not Machines for Producing Theologians and Philosophers.
This is good, of course, but greater attention needs to be applied across the board to the reform of Catholic colleges and universities so that true academic excellence can emerge through the vision and clarity which only deep fidelity engenders. This will not be accomplished through a simple exercise of authority, as the relationships in many cases do not permit the direct exercise of pontifical or episcopal discipline. Here the wisdom of serpents is necessary to secure the innocence of doves.
But I would add to our list of critical steps the creative restoration of Catholicity in the Church’s social service organizations and universities. This can join the prudent exercise of ecclesiastical authority and the emphasis on strong preaching which I have already identified as critical needs. Wayward social and intellectual institutions provide constant “experts” to the media, enabling the faithful of every stripe to claim support for patterns of life, thought and belief which, in reality, reject Christ—and so impede the New Evangelization.
Of course, some social service organizations and universities may get markedly smaller in consequence of their renewal. But given how frequently they directly impede or even reverse the evangelization of their beneficiaries and students, such a reduction would be a very small price to pay.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: koinonia -
Jun. 24, 2016 9:24 PM ET USA
This topic is vital. The Christian is called to witness. This is something manifest. It can be manifest by "confirming others". It can be a duty of state. When statements contradict or at least dangerously attenuate Christian principles the reality must be apprehended. Now there are tactical consierations, discretion, respect etc. But the Christian is called to witness. This demands generosity fidelity, humility, courage, & charity. It requires selflessness but never self delusion. Never.
Posted by: John3822 -
Jun. 23, 2016 10:06 AM ET USA
Thanks Jeff - I truly appreciate this and am glad you took the time to write this. One comment on discouragement - I think of how the elder brother (prodigal son) seemed to have such discouragement as well when he saw how his younger brother was welcomed and had the full court banquet while he in contrast (in his mind), received nothing - note also how the father ran to meet the younger brother at a distance before he had even uttered a word. Yet, no principal was compromised by the father.
Posted by: pvanderl7463 -
Jun. 22, 2016 10:28 PM ET USA
We, the laity, ARE the Church! The Holy Spirit speaks through us in communion with the hierarchy. Neglecting our responsibility has resulted in too much negligence in the Church. Jeff and Phil, I look to you as Lay Leaders to inform and share your info and insight. I love Pope Francis but so few people understand his contextual knowledge and virtue, that many are challenged by his words and actions. I trust he is an innocent. Thank you.
Posted by: BlaiseA -
Jun. 22, 2016 7:12 PM ET USA
My first reaction to some of the Pope's loose comments are to feel somewhat emabarrassed for him. He is human and his past does influence him; yet the Holy Spirit is guiding the Church. Be not afraid. You give me new ideas when I tend to 'wonder' about his comments; your respectful comments help a lot!
Posted by: skall391825 -
Jun. 22, 2016 6:08 PM ET USA
Good for you, Jeff. That took the type of courage and confidence that only faith can supply. You are one of my current-day heroes--even though you don't want to vote for Trump, thus helping Clinton win and continue Obama's anti-Catholic crusade :-)
Posted by: spledant7672 -
Jun. 22, 2016 6:08 PM ET USA
Everything you say above has already been evident in everything you write. I am deeply grateful for your guidance. You played a significant role during the time leading up to my conversion to the Catholic faith, and have continued to provide an encouraging example of Catholic discourse and perseverance since. Thank you.
Posted by: brenda22890 -
Jun. 22, 2016 9:46 AM ET USA
Jeff, you and Phil do indeed encourage those of us who become discouraged. And very often, your commitment to putting the best possible light on the words and actions of Bishops, even the Pope, are just the sobering words I need to consider. Thank you.
Posted by: rfr46 -
Jun. 22, 2016 6:24 AM ET USA
I do not think that either Mr. Mirus or Mr. Lawler have anything to apologize for in their very measured criticisms of various Church leaders.
Posted by: rjbennett1294 -
Jun. 22, 2016 5:20 AM ET USA
Today's Gospel reading contained the warning about "false prophets." Could that warning possibly apply to the Church hierarchy, even to the papacy itself? Of course not - or am I in denial?
Posted by: sw00d -
Jun. 21, 2016 10:47 PM ET USA
Thanks for this elaboration on the inner workings of your journalistic decisions. And thank you for your recent and charitable commentaries on the Pope. I appreciate them. I trust your presentation of the current matters. Thank you for your faithfulness.
Posted by: bernie4871 -
Jun. 21, 2016 9:42 PM ET USA
The priest admonished us "not to judge" when we have a "log" in our own eye. For me that is always so, but I find his comment nearly absurd. In the modern way of thinking, no one sins and everyone goes to Heaven, even the Devil - I've actually heard that from the pulpit. So what ever happened to "Admonish the sinner"? And who can spot sin better than a repentant sinner with a log in his eye? Can't he tell his fellow, "Hey, don't do that"? Go with it Jeff.
Posted by: gop -
Jun. 21, 2016 8:43 PM ET USA
I can only say "Thank You"
Posted by: BCLX -
Jun. 21, 2016 7:48 PM ET USA
our local ordinaries are the visible heads of the church in our respective geographic locales. As such, there is much to communicate about of both a faith or doctrinal nature and the more prosaic matters of administering a diocese. I personally have no reluctance to comment, critically if appropriate, about matters that are in as much my sphere of competence as my bishop's. After what some of those guys did--Law in Boston, Finn in KC--the laity have a duty to call them out as appropriate.
Posted by: ElizabethD -
Jun. 21, 2016 7:38 PM ET USA
I read this site mainly because the point of view is well informed and always measured and you think rather than freak out. I thought what you said was appropriate.
Posted by: timothy.op -
Jun. 21, 2016 7:24 PM ET USA
I have found you to be quite prudent and fair in carrying this out in practice. You've even bent over backwards sometimes in trying to construe some of Pope Francis' more careless comments in a sensible way. By candidly correcting erroneous or ill-conceived papal remarks, in a real sense you actually contribute to the effectiveness of the Petrine ministry, somewhat like those who upheld Moses' hands in prayer during Israel's battle with the Amalekites.
Posted by: JimK01 -
Jun. 21, 2016 7:15 PM ET USA
Or, we could just go along with all of the "misinformation" given us by our priests and bishops after Vat II. Thank God Benedict XVI came along and set us straight on so much of it. And thank God for Cardinal Burke who has spoken out at great personal peril. Then there are great saints who did not go along with their bishops and counterparts at the cost of their lives; e.g. John Fischer & Thomas More, whose feasts are tomorrow. Keep writing! The Truth shall make us free and get us to heaven.
Posted by: koinonia -
Jun. 20, 2016 6:53 PM ET USA
When Jesus came to earth he spoke. He spoke a great deal about life and death. He used parables- some very ominous- about grace and sin; life and death. Life and death matter. This obvious point is a great frustration for pro-life folks in dealing with so-called "pro-death" folks. Sin equals death. This is why saints embraced the rigors of sanctity. For decades there's been a war on the reality of sin. It now appears that sin faces untimely death. An irony, this would be a tremendous sin.
Posted by: Minnesota Mary -
May. 05, 2014 6:57 PM ET USA
"When the Son of Man returns, will He find any faith?"
Posted by: Ray and Ann -
May. 04, 2014 3:27 PM ET USA
Yes, the church has been betrayed by many from within. But who was at the head of the church when this heterodoxy proliferated throughout?...he was just raised to sainthood! I'm afraid that much of what occurred under John XXIII was due to his naiveté as well as the rapid secularization of the culture. I feel that he was unable to deal with it effectively at the time, and the situation in the church worsened under his papacy.
Posted by: John J Plick -
May. 01, 2014 6:45 PM ET USA
And "who" will do this? And does God overlook the fact that in the main this is NOT being done? I think not. But God is merciful, not to be confused with naiveté or (perish the thought!) stupidity. And what is going on in Peru right now? And who is the One who has orchestrated these circumstances? Certainly "no man.." A South American Pope dealing with a Pontifical University.. He has delegated the task, but he cannot delegate the responsibility. The problem as J Mirus has defined it is obvious
Posted by: Defender -
May. 01, 2014 6:36 PM ET USA
The consequences of doing nothing, which all of the American bishops have seemingly done, is to lose yet another generation of Catholics. Do we really want another generation lost? The Apostolic Constitution talks about Catholic universities and their "Catholic Identity", so it seems action can (and should) be taken. Most CINO universities have lost whatever "identity" they ever had anyway, so start with the Jesuit ones (Georgetown, BC, LMU, Loyola Chicago, etc) and be done with it.
Posted by: fenton1015153 -
May. 01, 2014 1:01 PM ET USA
You are right that Universities that carry the Catholic name have fallen. This did not happen over night. It began slowly like a child who is testing the authority of its parents. The child will do something he knows is forbidden to see how the parents will react. In a similar way the Universities tested the waters to see if their spiritual father the Bishop would react. So it comes back to Bishops who lacked true Love of God who let Universities stray from the light into darkness.
Posted by: ElizabethD -
Apr. 30, 2014 9:12 PM ET USA
"in general, for example, one can trust the Dominicans" The Dominican college in my location, Edgewood College (Madison, WI) is not Catholic at all. It's sponsored by the Dominican Sisters of Sinsinawa, who see themselves as being at odds with "the institutional Church." Edgewood has little or no connection to the local Church. The Eastern and Western Provinces of the Dominican Friars, and the Dominican Sisters of Nashville and of Ann Arbor are the ones that are good
Posted by: -
Apr. 30, 2014 8:47 PM ET USA
The Church can't do this, the Pope can't do that, its all so complicated. But the premise for this series is a smaller Church. The Pope can bring that on in an instant. He can speak softly while carrying a big whoopin stick. He could declare off limits on pain of excommunication all 'catholic' schools which refuse orthodoxy. He could force Catholics to face the issue, while clearly showing which side is right. He could severely cut into the financial health of the offending schools. Just do it.