the future is now

By Diogenes (articles ) | Oct 25, 2007

If, in 1997, you claimed the day was nigh in which guardians would be compelled to give their foster children gay-positive education, you'd have been denounced as a hate-monger, as someone trying to frighten the gullible with a maliciously improbable scenario. In the U.K., it appears, that improbable day has come, and -- surprise! -- you're a hate-monger if you fail to welcome it.

From the Daily Mail.

They are devoted foster parents with an unblemished record of caring for almost 30 vulnerable children. But Vincent and Pauline Matherick will this week have their latest foster son taken away because they have refused to sign new sexual equality regulations. To do so, they claim, would force them to promote homosexuality and go against their Christian faith.

The 11-year-old boy, who has been in their care for two years, will be placed in a council hostel this week and the Mathericks will no longer be given children to look after.

The devastated couple, who have three grown up children of their own, became foster parents in 2001 and have since cared for 28 children at their home in Chard, Somerset. ...

Officials told the couple that under the regulations they would be required to discuss same-sex relationships with children as young as 11 and tell them that gay partnerships were just as acceptable as heterosexual marriages. They could also be required to take teenagers to gay association meetings.

When the Mathericks objected, they were told they would be taken off the register of foster parents. The Mathericks have decided to resign rather than face the humiliation of being expelled.

Some of us can remember back to the days when Supreme Court justices argued against anti-sodomy laws on the grounds that gays inhibited by those laws were only claiming their share of "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men, namely the right to be left alone" -- and this in the minority opinion.

One wonders how much longer the "right to be left alone" will be accorded to orthodox Christians. Will your children dare to speak against the love (ahem) that dare not speak its name? Will they have a choice in the matter?

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 3 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Oct. 25, 2007 8:27 PM ET USA

    And why are we Christians still afraid to speak out? If we don't start defending our right to believe according to our consciences, we will soon no longer be allowed to profess or practice.

  • Posted by: - Oct. 25, 2007 7:18 PM ET USA

    One of the assignments in my NT class has the students memorize certain NT canticles against the day in which they are thrown in prison for standing up for Christian truths, and don't have access to religious services or literature. It could certainly happen here. I suspect with certain electoral results in 2008, that is more likely than not.

  • Posted by: - Oct. 25, 2007 1:20 PM ET USA

    There is a deep moral sickness that is just as deady as the Ebola virus or AIDS--and it is manifested through a kind of pseudo-tolerance which, like a computer bug, hides within the body politic until it finds just the right weak spot to begin a pernicious attack on the whole system. And that weak spot is what we usually term liberalism, Leftism, progressivism or the sexual compulsions that always now shout their name--Moloch.