A Synod slap at home schoolers
From Patrick Reilly of the Cardinal Newman Society, via the National Catholic Register, comes this ominous warning:
At the Youth Synod in Rome this week, one of the bishops’ discussion groups made some disappointing and ignorant comments about Catholic homeschoolers.
In one of the English-language discussion groups at the Synod, a summary of the conversation included these disturbing notes:
Home based schools—a model coming from America.
USA has many home schoolers—bishops in USA are not united, as homeschooling can have an ideological basis—kids may have special needs
are parents qualified to homeschool them?
Let’s answer that last question first. Yes, parents are qualified to teach their own children. In better times, Catholics could rely on their bishops to support the role of parents as “primary educators.”
Why is it, then, that the “bishops in USA are not united” in support of home schoolers? The note is chilling in its answer to that obvious question; the bishops of English-language Circle C referred to “an ideological basis.” As Patrick Reilly points out, liberal opponents of home schooling regularly use that term to disparage the home-schooling movement. The “ideological” label, Reilly remarks, is “what faithful Catholic home schoolers endure frequently from fellow Catholics, priests and even bishops—the charge that they are too ‘conservative’ and too ‘moralistic.’”
It’s painful enough that home schoolers are portrayed as “ideological” by champions of the public-school system, in which an increasingly toxic ideology reigns supreme. It’s outrageous that bishops, who should be defending loyal Catholics against this sort of unjustified attack, are instead joining forces with the assailants. Particularly outrageous, because many Catholic families would not be home schooling if the bishops had fulfilled their own responsibilities, and ensured the existence of parochial schools where young people could learn without being subject to the influence of the dominant secular ideology.
Would it be too much to ask that one or two bishops might inform the Synod assembly about the benefits of home schooling? About the often heroic work of the mothers (it is, in most cases, the mothers) who devote themselves entirely to the work of educating their children? They deserve the full support of the institutional Church.
Yes, there is a profile of typical Catholic home-schooling families, and it’s not inaccurate. Most are large families; the parents have been open to life. Most of the mothers stay at home, sacrificing income to provide a healthy home life and an authentically Catholic education for their children. These families are doing exactly what the Catholic Church has traditionally encouraged families to do, swimming against some of the most powerful currents in our society. They deserve the bishops’ support. Where is it?
Come to think of it, can you point to any recent document or statement from the Vatican, or from the US bishops’ conference, that provided support and encouragement for young families in which the mother stays home with the children? Take your time searching. I can wait. I’ve already waited—from the time when my children were born until now, when they’re all adults. Like so many other home schoolers, we’ve been looking to the hierarchy for help all these years, and now, reading this report from the Synod, I’m reminded of this morning’s Gospel:
What father among you, if his son asks for a fish, will instead of a fish give him a serpent; of if he asks for an egg, will give him a scorpion? [Lk. 11:11-12]
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: bkmajer3729 -
Oct. 19, 2018 11:30 PM ET USA
Home schooling is absolutely fine. This a parent's right to educate their children as best as they see fit. This is their right and their responsibility. At the risk of being branded insensitive and a "name caller" (which this is not), anyone who thinks otherwise is simply ignorant of the facts.
Posted by: Carole Foryst -
Oct. 13, 2018 5:55 PM ET USA
Its important to get a synod’s preliminary agenda as soon as its available to bishops so as to begin assembling like-minded bishops, priests and laity to organize presentations that espouse our views and insist on their inclusion in the final agenda of the official synod. The February agenda must be available now, somewhere. US Ambassador Calista Gingrich told me at the Reagan/John Paul II event two weeks ago she had not yet seen it. Abuse is not the central issue; homosexuality is.
Posted by: DanS -
Oct. 12, 2018 10:04 PM ET USA
I must admit to having reached, even passed the point where I can tolerate the blatant politicization of the Catholic Church and now the Catholic Faith by this Pope and his fellow leftists. Instead of seeing the world through the prism of the Faith, they see the world through the prism of their political ideology, thereby obliging the conformity of the Faith to that ideology. I can state affirmatively that I have had enough of it, and I know I am not alone. Rebuild the Church from the bottom up.
Posted by: shrink -
Oct. 12, 2018 11:54 AM ET USA
I do believe Chaput and Barron have praised homeschooling, but they are the exception. The rule seems to be a bishop's contempt for the devout who are not lining his pockets. If the homeschoolers gave big $$$ to the bishops, i'm sure more bishops would be singing the praises of homeschooling. As it is, homeschoolers are broke. I suspect many bishops hide their greedy motives by accusing others of being ideologues and evangelizing hatred. It's called the Judas syndrome, and it's contagious.
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
Oct. 11, 2018 11:09 PM ET USA
I have found a lot of clericalism in opposition to innovation in Catholic education. Homeschooling is one such recent innovation. There are others, but always in my experience the door is closed by a myriad of other "priorities," often unnamed. The most recent named "priority" is facility upkeep.