Now call it the Synod of Bishops and Selected Others
By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | Apr 27, 2023
Question: When is a Synod of Bishops no longer a Synod of Bishops?
Answer: When the participants are not bishops.
This year Pope Francis will appoint 70 non-bishops to participate, as voting members, in the October meeting of the Synod of Synodality. These lay participants will represent only slightly more than 20% of the Synod’s voters. Still their involvement raises the question. If it is a Synod of Bishops, why are lay people voting?
The involvement of non-bishops in a Synod of Bishops is not entirely new. At past meetings a few priests were appointed, to represent male and female religious communities. But this year the representation of non-bishops will be much greater, including lay people as well as priests. And the Vatican is anxious to tell us that half of the non-bishops will be women.
What is the significance of this change? Vatican officials boast that this year will see a much broader consultation with lay Catholics. But of course bishops have always been free to consult with anyone whose views they deem worthwhile. And for that matter the Synod itself is a consultative body; its product is not legislation, but a set of recommendations that the Pontiff may or may not endorse.
Nevertheless the Synod of Bishops is an important expression of collegial government— a recognition that all bishops, as successors to the apostles, have a special charism that enables them to lead and guide the Church. The Second Vatican Council, which called for a revival of the Synod, taught (in Lumen Gentium 23) that every bishop, “as a member of the episcopal college and legitimate successor of the apostles, is obliged by Christ’s instruction and command to be solicitous for the whole Church…” This is a duty proper to bishops, who have a corresponding grace of state to carry out that duty. In a hierarchical Church it is bishops— not priests, not religious, not lay people— who participate in the collegial decision-making process.
Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich of Luxembourg, the Jesuit prelate who as relator-general will chair the meetings of the October session, insists that the bishops have not given up their distinctive role. Questioned by Vatican News whether this meeting will truly remain a Synod of Bishops, he responded emphatically: “Yes, it remains so because the bishops are the majority!”
True, but anyone who has participated in a democratic process knows that a minority can constitute a decisive voting bloc, and with 20% of the votes, the lay participants will certainly be an important influence on the Synod’s outcome. Moreover, Cardinal Hollerich remarked, in the same interview: “We do not have a synodal parliamentarianism, where the majority decides and everyone follows.” So which is it: a majority decision, which bishops control, or a free-wheeling process, in which lay participants have equal voice?
And who will these lay voters be? The Pope will choose their names from lists provided by the world’s bishops, on the basis of several rounds of local meetings leading up to the worldwide session. Two points should be noted here. First, the lay voters will be chosen by the bishops— in the end, by Pope Francis. Second, they will be selected from among the participants in the preparatory meetings. So it is a considerable stretch to suggest that they represent the views of ordinary lay Catholics. On the contrary, they represent those Catholics who have already been involved in the bishops’ discussions. Do you feel confident that your views will be represented, simply because a lay participant will be allowed to speak? Should a Catholic woman feel that she has a voice, simply because another woman— who may or may not agree with her views— will have a chance to speak?
The participation of 70 non-bishops may be nothing more than window-dressing for the Synod. Or it may provide Pope Francis with the opportunity to ensure, by careful selection of those voters, that his favored initiatives will win approval. But the fundamental problem here is that the Synod of Bishops will become the Synod of Bishops and Selected Others.
Back in January, three top Vatican officials— Cardinal Pietro Parolin (Secretary of State), Cardinal Luis Ladaria Ferrer (Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith), and Cardinal Marc Ouellet (Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops)— wrote to the leaders of the German bishops’ conference, warning them that they “are not empowered to create a governing or decision-making synodal assembly” that included clergy and laity as well as bishops. The three cardinals made a point of saying that their letter had the explicit approval of Pope Francis. Granted, the Synod of Bishops is not a governing body, and technically not a decision-making body either, since the Pope makes any final decisions. But doesn’t the same logic—about the role and charism of bishops as leaders and teachers— still apply?
Unfortunately the German bishops’ conference has airily dismissed the Vatican warning, and plunged forward with its plans for a Synodal Council. Now it seems that Pope Francis, too, has set aside his own concerns, to head down the same path.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: jalsardl5053 -
Apr. 28, 2023 10:19 PM ET USA
Thus does secularism continue its poisonous seep into the sacred.
Posted by: rfr46 -
Apr. 28, 2023 2:59 AM ET USA
In principle, I do not object to laymen and women on the synod of bishops, but it depends on who will be appointing them. In this case, with PF's dismal track record, we can expect his packing the synod with highly objectionable people. Could it be worse than the current members? I am afraid so.