Catholic Identity in Education: A Long Way to Go
I was happy see Pope Benedict return to the theme of Catholic identity in Catholic educational institutions in his May 5th ad limina address to a group of American bishops. The battle for the Faith in Catholic higher education throughout the world was joined by Pope John Paul II in Ex Corde Ecclesiae in 1990. In 1996, the American bishops issued specific norms and guidelines for implementation of Ex Corde Ecclesiae in the United States.
For an overview of the norms, and the excuses which stand in their way, see my early 2011 commentary, Ex Corde Ecclesiae in the United States. For an important organization dedicated to the implementation of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, see The Cardinal Newman Society. Unfortunately, while many positive changes have taken place over the past twenty-two years, the pace of change remains agonizingly slow. Pope Benedict acknowledged this in his address: “Much,” he said, “remains to be done.”
Much does remain to be done, especially in implementing Canon 812, which requires all Catholics who teach in the theological disciplines in Catholic universities and colleges to have a “mandatum” (in effect, a formal license to teach) from the local bishop. The theological disciplines include not only formal theology, but Scripture, Canon Law and Church history. Universities include all Catholic institutions of higher learning.
I recall in this connection that, when Warren Carroll, myself and several colleagues founded Christendom College back in 1977, we set things up so that every member of the faculty had to take an oath of fidelity to the Magisterium of the Church as a condition of employment. But because the great majority of Catholic universities have been unwilling to impose such basic Catholic fidelity even on theologians, Canon 812 requires the individual faculty members to get the required approval from the local bishop, though many have not done so. There is no guarantee, of course, that a bishop will withhold the mandatum if a professor does not adhere to the Magisterium. Moreover, not all bishops have cared enough to insist on the mandatum at all. And of course some who have pressed the matter have been unsuccessful in bringing theologians in powerful universities to heel.
Of course, orthodoxy in the theology department is not by itself sufficient to establish a true Catholic identity in a Catholic university, though it is certainly a minimum requirement. As Benedict expressed it this week:
[T]he essential task of authentic education at every level is not simply that of passing on knowledge, essential as this is, but also of shaping hearts…. It follows that the question of Catholic identity…entails much more than the teaching of religion or the mere presence of a chaplaincy on campus. All too often, it seems, Catholic schools and colleges have failed to challenge students to reappropriate their faith as part of the exciting intellectual discoveries which mark the experience of higher education.
The Pope explains what every good Catholic parent knows, that “new students find themselves dissociated from the family, school and community support systems that previously facilitated the transmission of the faith.” And because this is the case:
In every aspect of their education, students need to be encouraged to articulate a vision of the harmony of faith and reason capable of guiding a life-long pursuit of knowledge and virtue. As ever, an essential role in this process is played by teachers who inspire others by their evident love of Christ, their witness of sound devotion and their commitment to that sapientia Christiana which integrates faith and life, intellectual passion and reverence for the splendor of truth both human and divine.
My recent review of Alasdair MacIntyre’s God, Philosophy, Universities (see Why Philosophy Matters) explains the secular fragmentation which has largely destroyed the mission of the university over the past few hundred years. Another reflection on that book, Augustine: Reason and Faith, Philosophy and God, explains exactly why the Pope sees Christianity as indispensable to that mission and to the quest for human understanding. Or, as he himself put it in his recent address: “The Christian commitment to learning, which gave birth to the medieval universities, was based upon this conviction that the one God, as the source of all truth and goodness, is likewise the source of the intellect’s passionate desire to know and the will’s yearning for fulfillment in love.”
But in most mainstream Catholic universities today, the faculty and administration, insofar as they claim to be Catholic at all, are devoted to a deficient secular vision of competitive excellence. Along with their own personal rebellion against God, this leads them to adopt Modernism as a way pretend that a culture-bound education is somehow Catholic. Only a day before the Pope’s ad limina address, I wrote about how Modernism poisons everything Catholic in Modernism hits the Jackpot, and Loses…Again. If this essay helps explain what Benedict and the American bishops are up against, so much the better.
But we need look no further for a telling case in point than the recent news about Bishop Robert McManus of Worcester, Massachusetts. Bishop McManus had the courage to instruct Anna Maria College to withdraw its commencement speech invitation to Victoria Reggie Kennedy (Senator Edward Kennedy’s widow) because of her rejection of Catholic teaching on the sanctity of human life. That this was even necessary indicates the nature of the problem. Yet the aftermath is even more telling. It turns out that there is so much resentment in the College ranks over this, that the administration has asked the Bishop not to attend the commencement exercises, because he would be a distraction. That is, he will be a focal point of opposition.
I rest my case. Pope Benedict knows the score, and it is not a comfortable score for the home team. Taken as a group, Catholic universities and colleges really do have a very long way to go.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: nix898049 -
Jan. 13, 2017 12:26 PM ET USA
The denial of Mary's perpetual virginity is one of the 5 insults against her that we are to make reparations for thru the 5 First Saturdays devotion. Sister Lucia of Fatima tells us Mary asked for this. It seems this is important now more than ever. May First Things get the message.
Posted by: John J Plick -
Jan. 11, 2017 10:19 AM ET USA
"Unforgivable" for a scholar? And what does that mean, that is, the term "unforgivable...?" Will "he" be shunned? Will his teaching privileges (if he has them) be revoked? Will his Bishop, or any other religious authority, "come against him??" No..., nothing like that will probably happen to him... JP
Posted by: unum -
Jan. 11, 2017 9:24 AM ET USA
First Things is no longer the publication that Fr. Richard John Neuhaus founded. I dropped my subscription long ago!
Posted by: -
Jan. 11, 2017 8:55 AM ET USA
Posted by: WBSM -
Jan. 11, 2017 7:57 AM ET USA
Leithart's article is a really short "blurt". He makes no reference to any sources, and his statements suggest ignorance of the sources that could have been cited for the theme. The problem is that instead of being a social network comment, it appeared as a First Things article.
Posted by: Mike in Toronto -
Jan. 10, 2017 7:27 PM ET USA
The "First Things" article is ridiculous and indeed hinges on a lack of understanding of the word "until". Consider: "Mabel's husband passed away, and Mabel remained a widow until she died." Okay, so did she remarry before or after her funeral?
Posted by: Elan -
Jan. 10, 2017 7:27 PM ET USA
Even the English translation is sufficient to refute this. If I say "I will keep myself pure until I get to heaven" does that mean that I will pollute myself once I am there? I think not!
Posted by: garedawg -
Jan. 10, 2017 10:44 AM ET USA
If I recall correctly, even most of the early Protestant reformers accepted the perpetual virginity of Mary.
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
Jan. 09, 2017 10:17 PM ET USA
Your explanation accounts for the high conversion rate of non-Catholic "scholars" who actually study the biblical text beyond the classroom and thesis/dissertation requirements. Many of these converts have become prolific Catholic apologists, professors, and writers. When I am asked why I am Catholic, my answer is that history compels me, reason compels me, honesty compels me. A careful study of true religion reveals a continuity that is unexplainable without reference to design by a logos God.
Posted by: John J Plick -
May. 10, 2012 11:51 AM ET USA
If I as a Supervisor gave a direct order to a Charge Nurse on a Unit, that was given in such a way that it could not be disobeyed, the sane response would be for the Charge Nurse to follow direction.Only a Nurse disoriented by anger would dare to disobey. Such is the case here. However if that same Nurse,after obeying, told me that she and the staff would “wish” that I not make “rounds” because it would “be a distraction to them,”rest assured that the first thing I would do would be to show up.
Posted by: shrink -
May. 09, 2012 5:56 PM ET USA
The colleges are lost. The parochial schools are for the most part lost. The bishops don't care, and the pastors don't want the hassles. There is no will in the bishops to educate anymore. I'm not even sure the Pope is interested. At any rate, he is not able to affect a change. Let's just move on.