argument #631,544 against John Roberts
By ( articles ) | Sep 08, 2005
Not being incompetent, slothful, improvident, or unfortunate, he hasn't experienced the effects of incompetence, sloth, improvidence, or misfortune. Dare we trust such a man with the Constitution?
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!