We must raise $1,633 by March 31st to pay critical bills. Essential to continue our mission. Donate now!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Wiggle room

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles ) | Nov 03, 2004

In South Carolina, a newspaper editor is annoyed by pro-lifers, but comforted by the campaign advice offered by the US bishops.

Isn't that a neat example of what the bishops' statement was designed to accomplish: to make people feel more comfortable about putting the pro-life issue aside?

This particular editor isn't much of a prose stylist. So it's striking when he comments, of the bishops' statement: "It was like reading one of my own columns." True; all too true.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our March expenses ($1,633 to go):
$35,000.00 $33,366.87
5% 95%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 5 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Gil125 - Nov. 03, 2004 4:59 PM ET USA

    Margo has a great idea. I have been sending a check to the Missionaries of Charity instead, but next time I may send it to Denver instead. And---equally important---send a photocopy of the check to your own bishop with a note saying why you have sent it where you have.

  • Posted by: Margo - Nov. 03, 2004 1:24 PM ET USA

    Perhaps those among the laity who are disappointed in the bishops' statement can registered their disappointment in a tangible way. During their Bishop's next annual appeal, they might send a check to a bishop who didn't wiggle but who stood strong and bravely taught the truth of the Gospel.

  • Posted by: Franko - Nov. 03, 2004 1:01 PM ET USA

    I think we need to carefully consider the argument that a candidate who talks Pro-life and may even vote pro life could be the wrong choice in an election if his/her other stands on issues would actually increase Abortion in the short or long term. If this candidate really supports firing single pregnant woman just for being pregnant, we need to question the seriousness of his pro life commitment.

  • Posted by: extremeCatholic - Nov. 03, 2004 12:14 PM ET USA

    All the bishops may be pro-life in a pro-forma sense but too many are anti-anti-abortion.

  • Posted by: - Nov. 03, 2004 10:05 AM ET USA

    Typical member of the "UNBIASED" press; the pro life crowd should just be quiet and our few brave Bishops and Priests should act like those who are gutless on the issue of life for the unborn. . No, Mr. Editor we will never just go away and leave the bully pulpit to you and your "UNBIASED" brethren. Pro life is now a political factor and will be at the forefront from now on. Thank God for EWTN and Father Pavone!

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Insights on the enigma that is Pope Francis 3 hours ago
Our Most Characteristic Vice? 3 hours ago
Recognizing the Noonday Devil 4 hours ago
Patricia Jannuzzi on gay activists: And the real problem is? 7 hours ago
Surrogate parenthood = exploitation of desperate women 9 hours ago

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope announces Jubilee: a Year of Mercy CWN - March 13