Arizona Supreme Court defines elements of clergy-penitent privilege
August 15, 2026
» Continue to this story on Religion Clause
CWN Editor's Note: The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that a Protestant pastor’s admission, in a conversation with his co-pastor (and brother-in-law), that he sexually abused the latter’s 13-year-old niece, does not fall under the state’s clergy-penitent privilege.
The court, citing an earlier decision, ruled that a legally protected confession is “a confidential acknowledgment or admission of a crime, sin, or fault to a member of the clergy, priest, or Christian Science practitioner for the purpose of absolution.”
“The dispositive question is not whether the penitent’s tradition observes a rite of absolution, but whether the communication sought spiritual absolution, consolation, or guidance,” the court continued. “Accordingly, a party invoking the Clergy-Penitent Privilege must first establish that the communication constitutes a confession.”
The above note supplements, highlights, or corrects details in the original source (link above). About CWN news coverage.
For all current news, visit our News home page.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
