22% of US bishops favor ordination of men with deep-seated same-sex attraction, survey finds
July 24, 2026
Twenty-two percent of bishops in the United States are “comfortable ordaining a man who experiences deep-seated same-sex attraction, provided he is firmly committed to celibacy,” according to survey data that appeared in a newly published report.
Bishops are more likely than vocation directors (9%), seminary spiritual directors/formators (12%), seminary rectors (16%), or seminary mental health professionals (17%) to support the ordination of men with deep-seated same-sex attraction (SSA).
The survey data, originally published in 2025, appeared in “Do You Know Them to be Worthy? Twelve Proposals for Bishops, Rectors, Seminary Formation Teams, and Mental Health Professionals in Assessing the Suitability of Men for Holy Orders.” The University of Notre Dame’s McGrath Institute for Church Life published the report on July 17.
The report’s authors, Father Thomas Berg and Dr. Timothy Lock of St. Joseph’s Seminary (Dunwoodie, New York), grouped their 12 proposals under three categories: “Proposals Aimed at a More Effective Use of Psychological Services in the Formation Process,” “Proposed Best Practices Regarding Candidates with Special Needs,” and “Proposals Aimed at Supporting Chastity and Celibacy Formation.”
“While universally acknowledging the complexity and fraught nature of the issue, there seemed nonetheless to be an emerging consensus specifically around the prospect of recommending to the bishops that seminarians who manifest a stable SSA should not be accepted into the configuration stage” of formation, Father Berg and Dr. Lock wrote. “The present authors, while endorsing that position, also recognize that there exists often sharp disagreement on this issue among key constituencies who play a role in judging the suitability of such candidates.”
“While the data indicates that a majority of bishops are not comfortable ordaining these men, there remains nonetheless a notable disparity of judgment in the body of bishops,” Berg and Lock continued. “Many of us who have worked in formation for many years can attest to instances in which undue pressure has been placed on a rector and members of the formation team to advance such candidates against their own judgment.”
Berg and Lock also called for a “more meaningful way of defining transitory same-sex attraction.” In a 2005 document whose teaching was reaffirmed under Pope Francis in 2016, the Congregation for Catholic Education stated:
The Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called “gay culture” ...
Different, however, would be the case in which one were dealing with homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem—for example, that of an adolescence not yet superseded. Nevertheless, such tendencies must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate.
At the conclusion of their report, Berg and Lock said that “ordinarily, bishops should accept the considered judgment of the rector and formation team regarding admission to seminary and promotion to successive stages of formation, unless the bishop possesses moral certitude that the seminary’s assessment is substantially mistaken.”
In 2004, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) published the John Jay report on the nature and scope of the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic clergy between 1950 and 2002; the report found that 81% of victims were male. A subsequent John Jay report, published by the bishops’ conference in 2011, nonetheless stated that “the clinical data do not support the hypothesis that priests with a homosexual identity or those who committed same-sex sexual behavior with adults are significantly more likely to sexually abuse children than those with a heterosexual orientation or behavior.”
For all current news, visit our News home page.
Further information:
- McGrath Institute for Church Life Publishes New Report to Strengthen Seminary Formation and Assessment of Candidates for Holy Orders (7/17/26)
- Full text of report (McGrath Institute for Church Life)
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: rsnewbill7950 -
Jul. 24, 2026 6:19 PM ET USA
Scandalous that that many would support this, but I'm no longer surprised.
-
Posted by: Crusader -
Jul. 24, 2026 5:49 PM ET USA
The article seems to indicate that those responsible for admitting candidates to the seminary trust that the candidates will be truthful in admitting if they have same sex attraction. Do we have evidence to support this? Does it seem reasonable that all candidates would be truthful in this especially if the particular diocese was known to reject those with same sex attraction?
-
Posted by: Lucius49 -
Jul. 24, 2026 10:30 AM ET USA
These bishops are themselves with same-sex attraction, or don't accept the teachings of the Church on the order of sexuality, or think the Church has the power to change the order of sexuality accepting gay ideology. They should man up and meditate on 1 Cor 6:9-10. The infiltration of gay ideology is the elephant in the room in the Church today and has to be confronted.
-
Posted by: feedback -
Jul. 24, 2026 9:30 AM ET USA
This is a valuable report showing serious division among Bishops and explaining much of the moral and vocational crisis in the Church today. It would be a matter of basic honesty on the part of the Bishops and Cardinals to disclose their own sexual proclivities ("come out of the closet") when they say that they are "comfortable" ordaining gays. If gay men keep getting ordained, then subsequently we will have gay Bishops, and gay Cardinals voting in future Conclaves. It'd bring joy to the Enemy.


