Wrongheaded diocesan legal defenses in abuse cases
A Missouri judge observes that when the Kansas City diocese suggests that it might want to reconsider an agreement with sex-abuse victims, it “sends a bad message.” It sure does. Yet it’s a message that Church leaders keep sending.
In Minnesota, another judge rejected a motion by the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis to dismiss a lawsuit that has been producing headlines there for months. “This case needs to be tried,” the judge said. Yet again, attorneys working for the Church had tried, and failed, to stop the locomotive that is roaring down the tracks.
In both cases, frankly—in Missouri and in Minnesota—the facts that have emerged are embarrassing for the Church. In both cases, public opinion leans heavily, and understandably, toward the plaintiffs. Church leaders and their lawyers face a choice: to fight the cases on their merits, or to settle and pay up. Efforts to avoid a public hearing, or to escape the consequences of a previous settlement, can only raise the level of suspicion that the Church has something to hide.
How many of these dilatory motions have attorneys for the Church filed in the past decade? Dozens? Hundreds? How many have succeeded? Can you name one?
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: cmaedunne9213 -
May. 02, 2017 7:52 PM ET USA
The feminists and the Spirit of the 1960's (a/k/a "silly season of the 60's") do not go down easily into that good night, do they? They are not Roman Catholics at all. They are not anything at all--they are self-excommunicated, which means they are outside the mystical body of Christ, and are members of the anti-Christ. Please pray for these misguided women--I believe that by committing this particularly egregious sin, they have endangered their souls. This is not at all good news.
Posted by: nix898049 -
May. 02, 2017 3:02 PM ET USA
The last line in the article also indicates the fake priest was poorly catechized. Excommunication removes one from the Communion of Saints. No one who is excommunicated goes to heaven. I hope she will take it seriously or join the Episcopalians and leave my Church alone.
Posted by: iprayiam5731 -
May. 02, 2017 2:30 PM ET USA
excuse me, isn't this exactly what you wanted in your last post: more vocations? (I kid, I kid.) But a commenter in the last post hit the nail on the head. Lack of vocations is a feature not a bug for the anti-tradition-minded. The shortage of priest is a justification for rethinking the priesthood.
Posted by: feedback -
May. 02, 2017 1:25 AM ET USA
Almost all of the comments from Charlotte Observer completely dismiss the journalistic hype in calling the event "Catholic" or "Roman Catholic." But describing the person as "the first Catholic woman priest in a Catholic diocese" is outright dishonest manipulation. Good catch.
Posted by: koinonia -
Jul. 27, 2014 10:05 PM ET USA
The problem runs deep. It really does (and it has for some time) appear that not only is this disturbing evidence of imprudence, impropriety or simple ignorance but goes mcuh deeper. Character. What manner of men are these? Is it possible that these character flaws have been isolated to this one area? A difficult question, but one that has, unfortunately, a pretty obvious answer. So much pain. Our prelates and priests need prayers. These issues are the kind that will keep on giving.
Posted by: [email protected] -
Jul. 25, 2014 5:13 PM ET USA
Obviously we have learned nothing about the stupid hierarchy in the American dioceses. We should be cooperating and getting rid of the bad seeds in our Church including the bad lawyers advising the bad bishops.