significant, Yes; new, No
By Diogenes ( articles ) | Jan 13, 2008
There's one glaring error after another in the Reuters story. (Go ahead; test yourself. If you can't identify at least 8 errors, you need to read CWN stories more carefully.) Let's just take the introductory sentence:
Pope Benedict celebrated parts of Sunday's Mass with his back turned on the congregation, re-introducing an old ritual that had not been used in decades.
This wasn't an old ritual. It was the Novus Ordo Mass-- the same ritual you probably followed in your own parish this Sunday.
True, the Pope celebrated ad orientem, and that hasn't been done-- by a Roman Pontiff in a public ceremony-- for quite a while. For that reason it's significant.
But what the Pope did on Sunday can be done by any priest anywhere in the Latin rite, and is done routinely by many priests-- including the Pope himself, in his own private chapel. The ad orientem posture was not abolished by Vatican II or by any other liturgical directive.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!