Let them eat CK

By Diogenes (articles ) | Nov 14, 2004

Charlotte Hays at Inkwell quotes Theodore Dalrymple on the subject of faux pauvres:

"The fashion of torn jeans is an insult to all those who must wear clothes with holes in them for lack of better ones: of whom, unfortunately, there are still many millions in the world.

"When I think back to the heroic efforts of poor Africans I have witnessed to make themselves smart and tidy for special occasions -- efforts that filled me with admiration -- I feel an anger at this frivolous assumption of false poverty by people who've never had to wear rags. Once, only Marie Antoinette played at being shepherdess; now, it's a mass phenomenon."

Probably there's a certain element of power trip in celebrity chic du slob ("I can dine at Lut├Ęce in sweat pants while you have to put on a tie..."), but D is right that it argues remarkable obtuseness toward the larger World Out There, and his remarks put me in mind of a passage from a 1993 New Yorker essay by Ted Conover, recounting his trip with a trucking convoy in East Africa:

I did not arrive with the three trucks in the escorted convoy but instead joined them in a fourth truck, Fleet 19, which was carrying empty beer bottles. Such a load, Malek explains, does not qualify as protected cargo. It is unlike auto parts, imported liquor, or "clothes from your dead people."

"What?" I ask.

"Yes, you know, the clothes -- the clothes they sell at markets," he says.

"But what dead people?"

"You know, the clothes they sell that have been worn by your people who now are dead -- nguo za mitumba."

It suddenly dawns on me. "Secondhand clothes."


I see that Malek, though he is a worldly man, who has travelled on three continents, does not understand the discarding of clothes that can still be worn. In other words, he does not understand the Western practice of fashion. I don't have the heart to explain it.

Maybe Susan Sarandon could make Malek see the point.

Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Nov. 14, 2004 11:12 PM ET USA

    The moribund state of classical fashion in America (the Western World?) coincides well with the rise of wealth, antidepressant use, divorce, STD rates and the fall of orthodox belief, traditional devotion, sense of sin and personal responsibility, etc. One can walk the entire length of an American mall on a weekend day and never see a man in suit and tie. This traditionalist has set out to do his part to stem the tide ... by wearing dress shoes and bowties in the ER! Ridiculous? Perhaps!

  • Posted by: - Nov. 14, 2004 5:40 PM ET USA

    Sure, one can sneer at Western consumerism. However, fashion in many areas--not just clothes--does fuel the economy in a way that causes an ongoing chain of creation of products and services. Fashion provides jobs in the Third World and, in the process, brings up the standard of living in those countries. Stop fashion and you shut down factories in China and Malaysia and cause severe economic hardship. None of us should be slaves to fashion but let's not get too spiritually proud in giving it up