“Oppression is now a psychological category”: the decline of civil disagreement
By Thomas V. Mirus ( bio - articles - email ) | May 18, 2015
Read this excellent article in First Things by Carl R. Trueman, "In Praise of the Dying Art of Civil Disagreement." The increasing inability of people to disagree without demonizing the opponent, even and especially in the places where discourse and debate are supposed to thrive, is one of the things that disturbs me most about our politicized culture.
Why is civil disagreement so hard? It cannot simply be a matter of dogmatic certainty. The woman minister and I were quite convinced of the correctness of our respective positions, both at the beginning and at the end of our exchange, yet we later enjoyed a delightful conversation over a glass of wine at the post-seminar reception. No, the failure of civil disagreement cannot be a function of certainty.
I think the lack of civil disagreement in the classroom is best understood as a function of larger social and political trends. As I have noted on this site before, oppression is now a psychological category. This subverts the crucial moral difference between an actual crime, a speech crime, and (increasingly) a thought crime. It has also pressed an already pragmatic philosophy of education into an instrument of politicized therapy.
...Human beings are no longer complicated persons bound together by the deeper unity of an underlying common nature but merely aggregates of whatever opinions they happen to hold. Thus, those who hold even a single belief which the panjandrums of the culture find obnoxious are of necessity essentially defined by that, no matter how marginal it might actually be to their overall social existence and no matter how many other virtues they might embody.
...The truly educated person is now no longer the person who understands an opposing viewpoint even as he rejects it. For even to understand an alternative viewpoint is to collude in the oppression which such an opinion embodies.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: nix898049 -
Oct. 10, 2016 12:08 PM ET USA
Oh, what a wonderful piece of writing! Thank you. Heavy artillery indeed. And at the service of Our Lady. I think we can all say, 'a(Carthusian)life unaided by Mary is unthinkable'.
Posted by: ElizabethD -
Oct. 06, 2016 5:20 PM ET USA
His Order never seeks anyone's canonization, but the saintly founder of the Vermont Carthusians, Fr. Thomas Verner Moore, should NOT be forgotten. His work in faithfully Catholic psychology prior to (when he was a Benedictine at Catholic University) and even after becoming a Carthusian is of great continued value. His teaching about the human/mental health value of growth in virtue & holiness was only underscored when he chose to give absolute primacy to the spiritual and become a Carthusian.
Posted by: kwonbbl1 -
May. 20, 2015 7:33 PM ET USA
A highly sophisticated Orwellian state we are heading to.
Posted by: shrink -
May. 19, 2015 8:17 AM ET USA
Welcome to the dictatorship of relativism.
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
May. 18, 2015 6:44 PM ET USA
The culture at the highest levels in my university has changed so drastically since the advent of Obama that your excerpt represents the substantial reality here. Many of the faculty are none too happy about it either, as expressed in recent dialogs.