No, your parish is not ‘vibrant’
By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | Sep 04, 2024
Could we all please agree to stop using the adjective “vibrant” to describe a Catholic parish, diocese, or other faith community?
Free eBook:
Free eBook: Liturgical Year 2023-2024, Vol. 6 |
My desktop dictionary (admittedly an antique, Webster’s New Collegiate, published in 1974) defines “vibrant” as “oscillating or pulsating rapidly”—something that is ordinarily done by inanimate objects, not by human beings, let alone human communities. Granted, the connotation of the word has changed over time, so that today it is used as more or less synonymous with “energetic” or “vigorous.” But those familiar old words conjure up distinct mental images, whereas “vibrant” leaves things somewhat vague. If someone says that the walls of his room are painted in “vibrant” colors, you know what to expect; if he says that he lives in a “vibrant” neighborhood, you’re not so sure. For that very reason, I suspect, the word is often used by publicists who want to make something sound more exciting than it really is.
Is your parish or diocese oscillating or pulsating rapidly? No. Nor should it. So why is the word “vibrant” invoked with such mind-numbing frequency to describe Catholic communities?
Use the word “vigorous,” on the other hand, and the claim that can be tested against hard realities. A vigorous community will show clear signs of growth, of movement, even of muscularity. Is that true of your parish or diocese?
There is spiritual growth, and movement of the Holy Spirit, in any place where good people gather to pray. Amazing things are happening on a regular basis in every parish where the faithful receive the sacraments. But do the people of that parish believe that the Holy Spirit is moving powerfully among them? Do they act as if they believe?
Even a somnolent parish might have a solid cadre of very active, devout, even saintly people, doing their best to live and spread the Gospel message. Anyone looking for signs of vigor in the parish will find them. But it is a mistake to assume that these stalwart Catholics are representative of the parish as a whole. Are they leaders or outliers? Do the majority of parishioners admire and seek to emulate them, or do their best to ignore them? In judging the health of a parish, one is making a generalization. It would be wrong to base the judgment exclusively on the most pious parishioners—just as it would be wrong to focus on the most flagrant sinners.
The fundamental question, really, is the overall tenor of parish life. Yes, there are promising signs of spiritual health in every parish. But what is the dominant trend; what is state of spiritual health in the community? Bear in mind, too, that the people most enthusiastic about the faith are likely to be the ones most active in parish activities, most visible around the church and the rectory. But then at a retirement home, where a visitor is likely to encounter young nurses and aides in the corridor, it would be foolish to characterize the place as “youthful.”
We, as Christians, profess a faith that the truth shall set us free. We must be truthful—if necessary, brutally honest—about the condition of our Catholic communities. Avoid the language of the PR flacks. Face the facts. Don’t describe a parish as “vibrant” if there are no signs of movement.
Or worse—and, unfortunately, more likely—if there is movement, mostly out of the church. We cannot continue to ignore the steady stream of Catholics—especially young Catholics—leaving the faith. A vigorous parish should be growing, not shrinking; there should be more baptisms than funerals.
For too long, Church leaders have avoided confronting a serious crisis of faith, preferring instead to accentuate the positive, to put the best possible construction on the evidence. Look out over the pews, and see dozens of people with their eyes closed. Could they be deep in prayer? Absolutely! But there is another possible explanation for their closed eyes, and it is dangerous to ignore it.
Christian realism involves looking at problems with a steady gaze, keeping both eyes open, but without rose-colored glasses. We know that the Holy Spirit can work in mysterious ways, so that sometimes a powerful spiritual renewal occurs without any outward signs. It does not follow that if there are no outside signs, a powerful spiritual renewal is underway.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
-
Posted by: Deacon0101 -
Sep. 09, 2024 6:29 PM ET USA
Phil, are you expecting a parish that is 100% solid practicing Catholics? That is not possible, even Jesus' Church of Apostles had two members that left him. One returned and the other was gone for ever. Clergy always works on the 80/20, 60/40 etc. rule if you can get your active percentage as high as possible then you have accomplished something. The rest is up to the Holy Spirit whose intercession is implored. Though our founder is the God-Man, wench never expect perfection in faith.
-
Posted by: grateful1 -
Sep. 08, 2024 12:32 PM ET USA
Sorry, Phil, but as a faithful, orthodox Catholic and a fellow word-lover whose standards are as exacting and as meticulously applied as yours are, I would describe the Cathedral of St. Thomas More in Arlington, VA as "vibrant." It is a beacon of hope, sanctity, and sanity in largely godless, leftist northern Virginia. Ask Jeff Mirus. I'd be very surprised if he disagreed.
-
Posted by: feedback -
Sep. 05, 2024 11:44 AM ET USA
Words like that are pretty typical in the corporate newspeak word salads. "Vibrant," "inclusive," "proactive," etc., can be found in some parishes' "mission statements." It's good to keep in mind and to follow the words of St. Paul: [Christ sent me] "to preach the Gospel, and not with the wisdom of human eloquence, so that the Cross of Christ might not be emptied of its meaning." 1Cor.1:17
-
Posted by: garedawg -
Sep. 04, 2024 5:27 PM ET USA
One of my sons lived in a neighborhood described as "vibrant". Of course, his car was broken into.
-
Posted by: Lucius49 -
Sep. 04, 2024 2:18 PM ET USA
Thank you for bringing up the v-word, beaten to death, meaning anything you want. It's a 70's word when much destruction was inflicted on the Church. In that destruction you heard "dynamic" "upbeat" "open" "rigid" blah. An exegete claimed a dynamic versus static Presence of the Lord in the Eucharist. There was a book "Psychobabble." Theobabble also exists. Years ago there were 3 columns of theobabble called the theological buzzword indicator. Match any combo of words all equally void of meaning