how much risk is too much?
One of the most difficult issues to address for the Catholic In Business (CIB) is assessing the moral permissibility of assuming more than a certain amount of business risk. All businesses carry a certain amount of risk, but when deciding to pursue a particular business venture, how much is too much?
For example: A business owner decides to pursue a new line of business, which requires a certain amount of investment without guarantee of return. His calculations indicate that even if the new line of business should fail, his core business will still be able to remain intact--but existing jobs will be lost. What is the owner's moral obligation to his employees? If the existing business is operating at a sustainable level, is it right to place jobs at risk for the purpose of pursuing another interest (and possibly creating more jobs in the future)?
The above example is an oversimplification, and I won't attempt to provide an answer to the questions raised. However, the point is that moral responsibility should at least be an influencing consideration for the CIB in assuming risk in business.
Many CIB owners/influencers register frustration that the social teachings of the Church typically provide guidance but not definitive solutions in addressing business questions. In the context of the current question...there is no "business risk morality calculator" built into the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
The CIB who is the most spiritually mature and steadfast in applying attention to cultivating virtue is most likely to bring the right tuning antenna to the "will of God business broadcast". However, Catholics are called to do all things well--therefore, diligence in properly and objectively building the business case to justify the assumption of risk is in itself a moral obligation.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Retired01 -
Sep. 29, 2019 7:43 PM ET USA
"Why is he so suspicious of religions conversions, when hungry souls rush in to Christ's banquet?" Good question, but PF will have to answer the dubia before he answers this one. We are waiting!
Posted by: Cory -
Sep. 29, 2019 10:49 AM ET USA
"Why is he so suspicious of religious conversions, when hungry souls rush in to Christ’s banquet?" Because he missed his calling. He should have joined Peron's party. Discernment was wrong - should have been a politician.
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
Sep. 27, 2019 10:48 PM ET USA
Let me rephrase Pope Francis: "Do not use words, but evangelize." Can one love what he does not know? Are the examples of lifestyle, good works, and "concrete" acts of will of themselves sufficient to teach what is known of the mystery of the Trinity, grace, the purpose and efficacy of liturgy, and other theoretical claims of the Catholic faith? I was once asked: "How do you expect to learn if you do not study? By osmosis?" Evangelization by osmosis. Hmm. Made "to _know_, love, and serve God..."