Archbishop Cordileone’s pastoral: Pelosi’s last warning?
With his pastoral letter powerfully reaffirming the importance of the Church’s teaching on the dignity of human life, San Francisco’s Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone has issued a serious challenge: to all Catholics, certainly, but to his brother bishops in particular, and especially to the prominent Catholic politicians who support legal abortion—notably including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, whose residence is in the San Francisco archdiocese.
“I tremble that if I do not forthrightly challenge Catholics under my pastoral care who advocate for abortion, both they and I will have to answer to God for innocent blood,” writes Archbishop Cordileone. He mentions no names, and he emphasizes that a bishop should admonish a sinner privately before taking any public action. But this pastoral letter cannot be the work of a man who plans to issue one more public statement and leave it at that. Any reasonable reader concludes that the archbishop has already admonished Pelosi (and others, less prominent, in the same position), and is now contemplating the next step.
“Abortion is the axe laid to the roots of the tree of human rights,” Archbishop Cordileone writes; “when our culture encourages the violation of life at its youngest and most vulnerable condition, other ethical norms cannot stand for long.” So the question of abortion is not just one issue on a long list of considerations; it is—as the American bishops have said repeatedly—the pre-eminent public issue of our day.
The public debate on abortion has become confused, the archbishop acknowledges. “The topic is swathed in sophistries by its advocates and discussion about it is forbidden in many venues.” He goes on to suggest that “this conspiracy of disinformation and silence is fueled by fear of what it would mean to recognize the reality with which we are dealing.”
The archbishop’s case against abortion, while it is strong, is not unique. He repeats the argument—well-known to pro-lifers, but rarely heard in the public square—that the question of when human life begins is a medical or scientific question, not a theological or philosophical one. And the medical/scientific answer is quite clear: human life begins at conception. Cordileone knows, too, that the argument for “choice” is a cheap rhetorical ploy, because abortion advocates are not interested in giving women any “choice” but abortion.
But again, these arguments are (or should be) familiar. The pastoral is newsworthy primarily because the archbishop directly identifies “another source of scandal that pertains specifically to Catholics in public life: if their participation in the evil of abortion is not addressed forthrightly by their pastors, this can lead Catholics (and others) to assume that the moral teaching of the Catholic Church on the inviolate sanctity of human life is not seriously held.”
Here Archbishop Cordileone is joining a debate that has roiled the American hierarchy for years, and come to a head this year with the election of President Joe Biden, another Catholic who aggressively promotes unrestricted abortion on demand. Archbishop Samuel Aquila has addressed the question in America magazine, arguing that the Church “must be willing to challenge Catholics persisting in grave sin.” That article drew an immediate protest from Cardinal Blase Cupich, who asked for a “public clarification,”. So an old debate was renewed, between American prelates who wish to fulfill their duty to protect the sanctity of the Eucharist and the consistency of Church teaching, and those who suggest that any disciplinary action would “politicize” the Eucharist.
The point, as Father Thomas Weinandy has observed, is that the Eucharist has already been politicized, by the public figures who profess their “devout” Catholicism while defending and promoting the slaughter of unborn children. Church leaders cannot dodge the challenge by saying that no politician is perfect. As Archbishop Cordileone puts it, “We all fall short in various ways, but there is a great difference between struggling to live according to the teachings of the Church and rejecting those teachings.”
Along with his pastoral letter, Archbishop Cordileone released a very useful “Questions Answered” section explaining aspects of the document. He disclosed that he had been drafting this pastoral “for a long time, but did not want to publish it during the election year, precisely to avoid further confusion among those who would misperceive this as ‘politicizing’ the issue.”
But eventually the issue had to be addressed, the archbishop explained:
If a bishop has members of his flock who are erring and causing others to wander from the truth, he has a moral obligation to call them to account. This should be done privately at first, and with great patience. However, if every other medicine fails, it may be necessary for them to refrain from receiving the Holy Eucharist until they repent.
The main question before the American hierarchy—the question that Archbishop Aquila and Cardinal Cupich are debating this year, the very same question that then-Archbishop Burke and then-Cardinal McCarrick debated twenty years ago—is whether Catholic politicians who promote abortion should be barred from Communion. Still it is noteworthy that Archbishop Cordileone mentions another disciplinary option, with a sidebar on “The Medicine of Excommunication.”
American Catholic bishops have been issuing statements for decades now, insisting on the crucial importance of the abortion issue. But to date, most have declined to take the next step, to impose some form of discipline on the prominent Catholics who have routinely ignored the Church’s teaching—and who now compound their offense, by threatening to silence or to punish anyone who upholds that teaching.
Archbishop Cordileone has repeated and underlined the arguments for Eucharistic coherence. More important, he has made public the case for taking that crucial next step. So now, while we hope and pray that Speaker Pelosi and her colleagues will recognize the force of the arguments, we are left to wonder if and when the archbishop will take that next step.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: [email protected] -
May. 05, 2021 1:03 AM ET USA
The Archbishop is very right to put out this guidance. The mistake he makes is possibly believing that Pelosi cares. She is so corrupt and power hungry that what the Church teaches is not relevant. Biden is another one. Their base is more important than Church rules or doctrines. There are also the Bishops who backup people like Pelosi and Biden. Good example are Cupich and Gregory both were mentored by Mccarrick. And we wonder why we have Church problems.
Posted by: miketimmer499385 -
May. 04, 2021 4:07 PM ET USA
Diocesan Tribunals regularly hold Catholics to account when pleading for annulments. Some marriages are declared null according to Church law, but other supplicants are disappointed and, of those, some walk away from the Church. Why, for goodness sakes, is the Church so hesitant to correct blasphemy in the matter of the Eucharist? Who can with a straight face argue against Burke and Weinandy? Let it be upon the politicians to decide which they would rather be, Catholic or a Democrat politician.
Posted by: JimK01 -
May. 03, 2021 10:41 PM ET USA
Wasn’t it Our Lady at Fatima who warned that “there will be wars and rumors of war and bishops will oppose bishops, etc”?
Posted by: feedback -
May. 03, 2021 6:18 PM ET USA
Thank you for this report and the commentary. I'm very happy to see the two prelates, Abp Aquila and Cordileone speaking up ahead of the USCCB June meeting. Very unfortunately, there is a crop of new bishops (Stowe, Cupich, McElroy) who seem to use their ecclesiastical office in attempts to downplay the moral evil of abortion and even normalize Catholics' support for it.