Action Alert!
Catholic World News

Catholic philosophers critique Fiducia Supplicans

January 17, 2024

» Continue to this story on First Things

CWN Editor's Note: Catholic natural-law philosophers John Finnis (Oxford) and Robert George (Princeton)—joined by Father Peter Ryan, SJ, the US bishops’ former executive director of the Secretariat of Doctrine and Canonical Affairs—have written a critique of Fiducia Supplicans and the subsequent Vatican clarification.

“We urge that bishops and priests should not authorize or provide the blessings at issue: the circumstances in which they will avoid doing grave harm are rare, if not practically non-existent—at least without the set of conditions we will mention,” Finnis, George, and Ryan wrote.

“The truth at stake, which it is a serious responsibility of pastors to communicate, is that sexual acts are gravely immoral unless they express and actualize a committed and exclusive marital union, the kind of union within which new human beings are entitled to be born and raised,” they added. “By commending a practice that, without all the needed conditions, will obscure that truth of faith and reason, the DDF’s pair of documents creates a large new obstacle to fulfilling a pastoral responsibility that is also an imperative of evangelization.”

The above note supplements, highlights, or corrects details in the original source (link above). About CWN news coverage.

 


For all current news, visit our News home page.


Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

  • Posted by: feedback - Jan. 17, 2024 9:58 AM ET USA

    The Catholic Authors pinpointed what's actually 'novel' about Fiducia and its 'clarification': There is "no crucial moral or pastoral difference between (a) blessing people who happen to be sinners, and (b) blessing people as parties to a relationship expressed in sinful acts. Never has the Church authorized a blessing under a description that identifies the recipients by reference to their sin (e.g., a blessing for pornographers as such)."