Then and now: Archbishop Roche vs. Archbishop Roche on the TLM
The traditional Latin Mass, Archbishop Arthur Roche said in 2015, is a “valid expression of the Church’s liturgy.” Yes, we want unity within the Church, but the archbishop explained that we are “not looking just for simple uniformity,”—especially because Pope Francis wants “unity with diversity.”
Now the same Archbishop Roche says that unity requires the use of the post-conciliar liturgy. “This is the Mass of the Church,” he says.
How can what was valid in 2015—to say nothing of 1960, or the centuries before that—be invalid or divisive in 2022? Answer: It can’t. As Pope Benedict XVI put it, “What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful.”
But it just did become harmful, according to Archbishop Roche, who has concluded that it must be forbidden (admittedly not quite entirely) for the sake of unity. Or is it now uniformity that he now favors? Certainly not “unity with diversity” in this case.
At least Pope Benedict’s argument has the virtue that it—like the traditional liturgy itself—is consistent over time.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!