We have $162,325 to go in our Fall Campaign. Every penny is used to strengthen the Church. See details!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

In a preposterous Vatican statement, one important revelation

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - email) | May 07, 2013

Today’s bizarre public statement from the Vatican press office, denying what any intelligent observer recognizes as the truth, does contain one nugget of reality.

The statement denies that there has been any difference of opinion between Cardinal Braz de Aviz and Archbishop Müller, when the cardinal has already made their differences public.

The statement claims that two Vatican congregations have been collaborating closely, when the cardinal has already revealed that one congregation didn’t know what the other was doing.

On those matters, the Vatican statement does not—how shall I put it?—correspond very closely with reality. However, when the statement adds that Cardinal Braz de Aviz and Archbishop Müller met yesterday, there no reason to doubt that is true. It seems likely that other Vatican officials (one or two names come to mind) insisted on that meeting. And it is worth noticing what the two prelates were said to have agreed upon; they “reaffirmed their common commitment to the renewal of Religious Life, and particularly to the Doctrinal Assessment of the LCWR and the program of reform it requires, in accordance with the wishes of the Holy Father.”

Thus after making a few claims that will be quickly and rightly dismissed, the Vatican statement actually underlines an important point: that the reform of the LCWR is required, and that Pope Francis supports that reform.

If Cardinal Braz de Aviz hoped to undermine the CDF plans for reform by going public with his dissatisfaction, that move backfired.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($162,325 to go):
$200,000.00 $37,674.72
81% 19%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: ElizabethD - May. 07, 2013 10:36 PM ET USA

    I wondered if perhaps Braz de Aviz had been hearing all kinds of upset from sisters and felt that they were untrusting of his office, and exercised amazingly poor judgement in wanting to say to them "hey it wasn't us, they didn't even ask us, don't blame me." I have been really struck by what a hard time there seems to be getting really excellent people for the Congregation for Religious. But then I think, how many really EXCELLENT religious have I ever met?

  • Posted by: AgnesDay - May. 07, 2013 3:42 PM ET USA

    Apparently Cardinal Braz de Aviz didn't get things his way. I suppose it's too much to expect Vatican administrators to universally respond with discipline and humility. In any human institution, that's apparently the exception rather than the rule.

Fall Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

What about Catholic affirmation for those in false marriages? 0 hours ago
Free eBook: Pope Francis' Catechesis on the Family 24 hours ago
The headlines say Gov. Brown is Catholic. He says he's not sure what that means. October 7
Archbishop predicts Synod won't change Church teaching. Why am I not reassured? October 7
A different tone at this Synod? October 6

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
In Cuba, Pope emphasizes service to the vulnerable, praises thaw in US-Cuban relations CWN - September 21
Pope challenges America in speech to US Congress CWN - September 24
As Synod opens, Pope calls on Church to defend ‘unity and indissolubility’ of marriage bond CWN - October 5