Snowbound thoughts on natural law
By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | Jan 27, 2015
Here in the northeastern US, the hysteria over the winter storm dubbed Juno began several days ago. It peaked on Monday, as the storm approached, with the Mayor of New York predicting a catastrophe of historic proportions. In fact, the storm breezed through New York, leaving only a genteel dusting. I wonder if anyone will learn from this experience, or if the hype will be just as intense for the next big storm.
Mind you, this is a big storm. We live in what’s being called the “jackpot corridor” for Juno, and we already have well over a foot of snow on the ground, with several hours of blizzard conditions still ahead of us. I’ll need to begin plowing and shoveling soon, as soon as the “whiteout” conditions abate, and I’ll be busy for quite a while. But this is New England. Snow happens. We’re ready for it, or should be.
Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker has declared a state of emergency, and banned all non-emergency travel. That’s perfectly reasonable, I suppose, and yet the announcement made me chuckle. It’s true that we can’t venture out on the roads. But that’s due to Mother Nature, not Governor Baker. I mean, even if the governor said that I could drive, I still couldn’t. It’s not physically possible.
Recently I’ve been devoting a lot of thought to the decline in understanding of natural law. When a society ceases to acknowledge the existence of some higher authority, the government tends to usurp responsibility for deciding things. So a political official formally declares what any rational person should know without being asked: that you can’t drive a compact car through 4-foot snowdrifts.
And yet, when people are trained to rely on government to decide all important questions, they sometimes lose the ability to make rational decisions by themselves. My wife reminds me that after the last big snowstorm here, she spoke to the manager of a small store, whose boss ordered him to open up the shop, long after the roads were closed. Fearful of losing his job, he made the risky trip, opened the doors, and sat alone in the store until the police ordered him to close down. Even then the police officer had to speak on the phone with the poor man’s boss, explaining that the decision to close the store was not voluntary.
A major storm of any kind should always be a reminder that we are not in control of our own fates. Nor is the government the authority that ultimately governs our lives. A blizzard does not settle the argument about natural law. But it helps. Under conditions such as we’re experiencing today in Juno’s “jackpot corridor,” the laws of nature are making a mockery of the laws of man.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: nix898049 -
Jan. 13, 2017 12:38 PM ET USA
Thank you, Randal. I was about to sputter something about the silly notion that we all worship the same God. A cooler head prevailed!
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
Jan. 10, 2017 12:04 AM ET USA
"The hidden God, the 'transcendent point' common to all...religions." Thank the Lord he didn't say "omega" point. I would like a definition of the "transcendent point" common to all religions. Buddhism, for example, does not have a "transcendent point." The "hidden God" is just another code name for the "immanent God," a god that exists fundamentally within the mind, the congregation, the world; the polar opposite of a transcendent God, creator and sustainer of all, independent of His creation.
Posted by: brenda22890 -
Jan. 28, 2015 12:39 PM ET USA
Everything you say is absolutely correct, Phil. Yet my employer depends on the government to decide if I can be absent from work or not (so I brought work home...)