Selective use of authority?
By Phil Lawler ( bio - articles - email ) | Mar 18, 2003
The astonishing statement by Bishop Botean, informing Romanian-Catholic Americans that they must not cooperate in war against Iraq— under pain of mortal sin!—puts me to wondering: Does a bishop have the authority to bind his flock in this way? At least one canon-law expert believes that the Holy See must answer that question quickly, to resolve the conflicts that will inevitably arise in the consciences of Romanian-rite Catholics. My question is this: Has Bishop Botean—or any other American bishop—issued a similarly blunt statement indicatying that it is a mortal sin to vote for a politician who supports legal abortion? For that matter, has any bishop recently stated in public that it is a mortal sin for priests to engage in homosexual acts? It would be much easier to accept bishops’ authoritative statements on issues that are at least arguably outside their jurisdiction if they made equally bold statements about issues that are clearly within their jurisdiction.
Previous post
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!