Action Alert!

five years on

By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 24, 2008

Off The Record has now been in existence for a span of five years and to the extent of forty-six hundred postings, and it may be opportune to do what we've heretofore left undone, namely, to explain what we think we're up to.

Though sub-tagged "Notes from the Newsroom," OTR had its beginnings in an ongoing exchange of e-mails between half a dozen correspondents wryly exasperated by the failures of senior ecclesiastics to conduct themselves as Catholics, and by their even more distressing failures to permit others access to the Church's spiritual bounty. Many of our exchanges took the form of routine grousing about the flakiness of this or that homily or pastoral letter or interview, but underneath there was a deeper sense of unease. Bad churchmen are a vexation, but an understandable and probably unavoidable vexation. Harder to explain -- and progressively harder to deny -- was The Void at the center of the Church's activity: the absence of concern for souls in jeopardy.

"Work out your salvation with fear and trembling," said St. Paul, "for it is God who is at work in you." OTR was created to grapple with the problem (never articulated as such by the contributors): how does a Catholic work out his salvation when his pastors don't believe there is any damnation to be saved from?

Perhaps no Catholic bishop or religious superior has publicly stated his disbelief in the possibility that a soul might be lost. Yet it is so rare for a churchman to affirm this doctrine that it's stunning when it does occur -- think of the amazed indignation in response to the disciplinary actions of Bishops Bruskewitz and Burke.

More disquieting than the bishops' silence, however, is their "performative" repudiation of a salvific component to their ministry. Whatever their personal opinions may be, they don't act as if it were possible for a man to lose his soul by making a spiritually lethal choice.

Imagine a mother whose toddlers crawl past her legs under the kitchen sink, open various bottles marked with the skull-and-crossbones, pour the contents into sippy-cups, and then trot off drinking the contents while she shakes her head in bemused resignation. Either the woman is criminally negligent, or she doesn't believe the marked bottles really contain poison. There is no third possibility.

The eerie but incontestable fact is that most Catholic pastors behave like this unnaturally nonchalant mother. The Church still labels certain bottles with the skull-and-crossbones -- i.e., she still professes a belief in mortal (soul-destroying) sins, but even those of her clergy who give verbal assent to Church doctrine seldom conduct their office in a way that is intelligible if the doctrine were true.

Take a simple example: weekly participation in the Sunday Eucharist is a Precept of the Church, failure at which the Catechism calls a grave sin (§§2180, 81). Less than a third of U.S. Catholics abide by this precept. That means more than 60 percent of the laity are at grave spiritual risk. Yet perhaps one clergyman in a thousand displays the concern toward the 60 percent he'd show toward someone in danger of bodily death. It's likely that many among that 60 percent are too poorly catechised to commit a deliberate mortal sin by skipping Mass, but inasmuch as this compounds the failure of the clergy, it should increase their alarm rather than allay it. By their insouciant inaction they announce they don't take damnation -- theirs or their flock's -- as a serious possibility.

Or again, think of the Church's missionary outreach to the unevangelized: once a prime concern for Catholics everywhere, now emptied of urgency by the sentimentalism that surrounds the Anonymous Christian and his exotic spiritualities. Missionaries return to give us glad news of wells dug or dances learned, rarely of pagans baptised.

One can examine ecclesiastical endeavor along any axis of Catholic teaching and find further performative confirmation of The Void. But it was the crisis of clergy sexual abuse that changed unease to outrage. Shocking as the abuse was in and of itself, the truly unsettling aspect of the scandal was the reaction to the abuse on the part of bishops, religious superiors, and other clergy in positions of responsibility. The official denials, the cover-ups, the silent transfers of offenders, the hardball tactics with victims pointed to a moral callousness than appalled even civil agencies. Still worse, and immeasurably harder to reconcile with the Faith, was the near-total absence of concern for the spiritual destiny of the victims, the perpetrators, and (in view of their lying under oath) the bishops themselves. OTR was born out of our stammering attempts to make sense out of a Church governed by churchmen drowsily indifferent to her supernatural ministry. Either they are malign, or they don't really believe anything important is at stake. There is no third possibility.

OTR has permitted itself disparagement of "empty suit" clergymen, especially senior ecclesiastics, disparagement that many good-willed Catholics find repellent in itself and contrary to Christian discipleship. We do not doubt the good faith of their objections; we hope our critics are right and hope that it is we who have misread the situation; we wish them success at proving us wrong. But the key sticking point is that these critics deny what we find undeniable: the bishops indulgently beaming at the little ones with Liquid Plumber in their sippy-cups.

Unlike the liberals or the factionalist Right, OTR is not calling for "structural change" or some newfangled system of accountability. Individually we've each written numberless letters of appeal to numberless ecclesiastics, but OTR does not circulate manifestos or canvas signatures for petitions. We want the clergy to do today what the Church has called them to do from her beginnings. If our dismay sometimes takes a sardonic form of expression, it should be remembered that we're measuring our pastors not against an idiosyncratic standard of our own devising, but against the promises they themselves made on taking office. The goal is to alert high clergy and low that some Catholics still count on these promises, and to remind them -- in terms they're likely to remember -- that their spiritual duty is not optional.

In the course of the next month OTR will be re-posting some blog entries from the first half of its existence, by way of providing some background for new readers and a kind of synthesis for others. Feedback in the comboxes, especially critical comment, is always welcome.

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 11 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: - Mar. 25, 2008 1:18 PM ET USA

    Diogenes, I've been reading OTR for about four of those five years.Alot has happened in the Church in those years. Plenty bad, and (thank God) some good... for all the bad that has happened - the predictability of it evokes my despair. For all the good that has happened, the fragility of it inspires me to prayer. OTR remains a unique vantage point to consider events. Looking forward to the review.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 25, 2008 11:38 AM ET USA

    Wow! You said. My husband made copies of this and sent it to all clergy in our deanery.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 8:57 PM ET USA

    I have been a Catholic now for thirteen years. I recall back then being really scared that the Church would not hold firm (e.g. things like women's ordination). But I believed, and believe, that it is Christ's Teacher in the world. I have just purchased, and read, "The Faithful Departed" - and have a return of that feeling! Still - I can go nowhere else. The Church - and only the Church - has the words of eternal life.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 5:02 PM ET USA

    Yes, but there is the elephant in the living room that no one wants to confront: the indifferentism flows down from the top. The behavior both of this pope and his predecessor often gives the impression that non-Christian religions are legitimate means of achieving salvation. At the very least, the signals sent are mixed. Roman Catholicism is a top down sort of religion. If you expect order at the bottom, the top needs to get its act straight, and I don't see that happening in my lifetime.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 1:54 PM ET USA

    I agree with Molly. In many cases, faithful priests — faithful to their vows, faithful to their mission, faithful to their flocks — suffer from the hands of their bishops and fellow clergy than from any people outside the Church. It is frustrating for me to watch holy priests never be honored with the title of monsignor, while those who do become prelates act more like bureaucrats than shepherds and who know the correct buttons to push in the chancery. Pray, pray, pray for all of our priests!

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 1:46 PM ET USA

    May we all remember that the salvation of our soul includes in a large part what we do for the Salvation of Others. As a laywoman and a reader for most of your five years, I do thank your ongoing effort. God Bless.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 10:09 AM ET USA

    The faithful priests have suffered terribly through this crisis of intellectual, spiritual and moral deficiency. They read CWN and they read OTR and it reminds them they are not alone. It gives us all hope and - no small thing -it gives us a chance to laugh out loud sometimes! Supporting our faithful priests is one our most important duties,especially in times of trouble and Uncle Di and readers do this. Let's add to that with the promise of daily prayers for all who are reading this site.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 8:36 AM ET USA

    Dear Uncle Di (all of you, I guess!), For those of us new to the faith, you have provided an invaluable catechesis that has kept our spiritual life reasonably clear of hairballs, clogs and other stoppages. For all of us, pride can sometimes stop the baptismal grace from flowing as quickly as it should, but OTR is a reasonable means when other methods of unclogging the pipes fail. I look forward to more tutelage from OTR and Mr. Lawler. ADMG, PsD

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 8:16 AM ET USA

    You have hit the nail on the head! Well stated. Some, hopefully relatively few, in the clergy, have no interest in the salvation of individual souls. Too many souls are being lost due to lack of direction from the individuals whose mission it is to help in directing souls to God. I look forward to reading the blogs that you will be re-posting.

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 7:20 AM ET USA

    Amen to "Japheth"!

  • Posted by: - Mar. 24, 2008 5:39 AM ET USA

    OTR has been one of the most refreshing voices of common sense that I've read in the past five years. It has been painful watching the dereliction of duty of so many clergy and religious, and then watching so many good Catholics remain silent because we often hear that we should never criticize priests as if this was an addendum to the Golden Rule. Many priests are unfairly criticized, but OTR provides a much needed clarity in our ecclesastical confusion. Viva Diogenes!