ecumenism & counterfeit compassion

By Diogenes (articles ) | Nov 28, 2006

I was especially edified last week to read that the Church of England and the Catholic Church had agreed to stand together against the negative effects of materialism and in favor of care for the environment. Prior to the meetings that forged the new consensus, the C of E had been in favor of the negative effects of materialism and the Catholics were against care for the environment. Or maybe it was the other way around. Whatever situation may have obtained in the past, the key point is that industrial polluters and mega-yacht merchants, e.g., now face a vastly more formidable opponent. "These folks may not agree on the contents of Schori's ciborium," mutter the bad guys, "but they form a united front against disposable diapers! I'll have to tread carefully from now on ..."

Two years ago, Anglican Archbishop Gregory Venables remarked, "It is clear that the irreconcilable contradictions in Anglicanism can no longer be disguised by the mask of inclusive language and jolly photo-calls." Jack those contradictions up to the ecumenical level -- where they're considerably more intractable -- and it appears that jolly photo-calls are the meat and marrow of the business.

The photo above was taken at a 2004 launch ceremony at which the Archbishop Rowan Williams and Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor were the star attractions. To raise awareness for affordable housing (of which both men are in favor) and to demonstrate solidarity with the homeless (for which both men feel compassion), they pretended for the cameras to be "taggers" and spray-painted "+Rowan" and "+Cormac" on the Housing Awareness Wall -- you know, just like Crips and Bloods in da hood. Many a stovepipe hat-wearing capitalist and many a tattoo'd gangsta felt hot tears of elevated awareness well up in the corner of his eyes. And when +Cormac actually shook the mittened paw of a coincidentally well-placed dosser ...

... why, there wasn't a dry seat in the house.

Those of cynical temper may complain that homelessness in London, unlike Calcutta, is not primarily an economic failure, and that a grinning archbishop's vandalizing a plastic tarp indirectly reinforces the social irresponsibility and passivity that do create the misery. The same cynics, more ungenerously still, may deplore the fact that senior clergymen should be trotted out like pop musicians or football stars to pull off a publicity stunt -- a stunt that's part of a lobbying effort (re-distribution of public resources), and aimed less at small acts of Christian charity than large disbursements of government largesse.

Following the cynics, the carpers might further point out that the proven remedy for homelessness is a stable family life; indeed, the data show that, in First World nations at least, if you and your father are both married to your first wives, the chances of your receiving public aid are tiny and the chances of your being homeless virtually nil. The churches, moreover, are in the best position of any social institution to reverse the trend toward family collapse -- not only by encouraging marriages among their members, but by using their moral authority to combat social ills that weaken marriage: easy divorce, premarital promiscuity, abortion and contraception, and various nuptial counterfeits such as cohabitation and same-sex unions. But fighting these battles in public creates fierce opposition; it takes the guts to face a hostile government, hostile media, and a sizable percentage of hostile clergy and laity. The real path to solving homelessness is a tough one. How much easier to pose for the cameras tossing tax-funded marshmallows to grateful bachelors!

It may be objected that one of the common projects to which Canterbury and Rome committed themselves was precisely that of a healthy family life. This is true. However, inasmuch as C of E permits its clergy to partake of same-sex unions, the notion of "the family" this joint effort will defend is so elastic as to be -- how can we put it? -- ecumenical.

Yet it would be churlish to end on a note of despair. The photo below caught the attention of the Church Times, which featured it in its bi-weekly caption competition. The CT's winning entry and the runner-up (below) show that there's still a place in the British heart for inter-faith collaboration.

Primate. The New Fragrance for Men.
-- Robert Titley

You're the scholar, Williams: how many g's in "bugger"?
-- Mary Roe.

Your turn.

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 15 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Art Kelly - Nov. 30, 2006 12:58 AM ET USA

    The 23 November 06 Joint Statement between Pope Benedict XVI and the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, posted on the Vatican website states in part, "There are many areas of witness and service in which we can stand together, and which indeed call for closer co-operation between us:...promoting respect for life from conception until natural death;..."

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 8:52 PM ET USA

    Let's give Rowan and Cormack a great big "Kumbayah"!

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 5:08 PM ET USA

    "This 'tagging' thingee is so fun! Let's go vandalize some real council estate slums! And would someone get this poor man wrapped in the clean blanket a properly filthy one before the media arrive?! And give me that hand sanitizer this instant!"

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 3:51 PM ET USA

    "I say, Cormac, sniffing simply will not do! For a proper buzz one must huff!! Do try avoid soiling the vestments.."

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 12:12 PM ET USA

    Somewhere in purgatory, Evelyn Waugh just threw up and said: "Edmund Campion was drawn and quartered for this?" Someone ought to write a book.

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 12:04 PM ET USA

    Art Kelly, I have not read the statement but I'm willing to bet that it did NOT contain a "commitment to fight against abortion." At the most, it would have had a passing nod that paraphrased the "save, legal, rare" mantra. If I'm wrong please post the reference.

  • Posted by: Art Kelly - Nov. 29, 2006 1:48 AM ET USA

    The joint statement included a committment to fight against abortion.

  • Posted by: - Nov. 29, 2006 12:36 AM ET USA

    At the time of the Reform of the Mass of Pius V, when Vatican II indicated that the vernacular was preferred, many of my High Episcopal friends were appalled/chagrined since they had worked for generations to restore the Latin Mass to their liturgies. Sic tempora, sic mores.

  • Posted by: fisherman129 - Nov. 28, 2006 7:58 PM ET USA

    Very cynical report, in my opinion.

  • Posted by: - Nov. 28, 2006 2:58 PM ET USA

    Oh, what backbone, what spine, what fortitude and faith of the prophets, the martyrs, of Christ and His disciples! 2,000 years later, and so many Anglicans wind up with Barney doll prelates and Catholics with the music of Marty Haugen!

  • Posted by: - Nov. 28, 2006 2:39 PM ET USA

    Uncle Di, that was another zinger! And those captions! :-D

  • Posted by: - Nov. 28, 2006 2:35 PM ET USA

    While I love talking with Protestants who actually try to be theologically honest, I have never been able to take Anglicans/Episcopalians seriously, since their group started on account of politics. Some do not even take themselves seriously, calling their "communion" merely "Catholic lite" or "Convenient Christianity". Yet what does irk me is that they were allowed to have "Eucharist" at Santa Sabina in Rome. What a hearty blow-off to the English Martyrs who died for the fullness of the faith

  • Posted by: - Nov. 28, 2006 2:19 PM ET USA

    Good, make sure you don't miss a spot. Cover the whole thing. We protestants call it "Justification."

  • Posted by: - Nov. 28, 2006 1:23 PM ET USA

    Shouldn't there be two 'c's in 'eccentrics'?

  • Posted by: parochus - Nov. 28, 2006 12:27 PM ET USA

    Is it still false ecumenism if we use indelible ink?