Onan's common ground
By Diogenes ( articles ) | Nov 08, 2007
Lisa Sowle Cahill, the noted Boston College professor and former president of the Catholic Theological Society of America, has graciously offered instruction to the US bishops on the proper approach to election-year debates.
...the bishops can help foster a more civil and productive dialogue in 2008 by avoiding public denunciations of a candidate's position on a single issue and instead help illuminate the broad range of common-good values that animate our most critical political and moral challenges.
Right. It's that old-time seamless-garment religion. You want details? We've got details:
Can public officials who support a reckless doctrine of preventive war, turn a blind eye to poverty in the world's richest country, justify torture in the name of national security, or vote against health insurance for poor children really be called pro-life?
There may be some subtle moral distinction between the guilt of someone who supports dismembering unborn babies and someone who fails to take global warming seriously, but let's not quibble about such details. Instead Cahill forges ahead, and discovers that elusive Common Ground, embodied in a policy that any reasonable Catholic politician could support:
In fact, pro-life and pro-choice members of Congress have been working together on the "Reducing the Need for Abortions and Supporting Parents Act" that will do just this by seeking to prevent unintended pregnancies by expanding health-care services for low-income women and beefing up adoption programs.
Just what sort of "health-care services" will prevent unintended pregnancies? Vitamin supplements? Blood-pressure monitoring? No, I think Cahill's favorite legislators have something else in mind.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!