graywash

It is unfortunate—and unusual from the perspective of standard research practices—that the (John Jay) study does not provide a breakdown of the number of reported (pederasty) cases within each diocese. Nor does it provide a listing of the bishops who governed their respective dioceses over the reporting period and a tabulation of the seminary origins of the offending priests.
...chop
The summary tables do indicate that there were some regions of the country (clustering two or more US dioceses into a single unit) that reported no incidents of abuse. Those diocesan regions with no reported sexual abuse are in stark contrast to other regions that reported over 20 percent of priests having been accused of sexual misconduct with minors of the same sex. (John Jay Report Table 2.3.3) The fact that there were evidently numerous dioceses that reported no abuse--whereas others seemed to be a sexual playground for pederasts--suggests that the severity of the problem of abusive priests varies widely across the United States and does not lend itself to a simple summary...
 

Now, did you ever wonder why so many Irish bishops were forced to resign within weeks of the Irish report on sex abuse while no US prelate resigned after the release of the John Jay Report?  One of the reasons is because the Irish report was a real audit, while the John Jay Report was a graywash. The Irish report was an audit of the sexual abusers and their superiors with names and dates of specific bishops and dioceses. Once the particular players were clearly distinguished for their deeds, their positions as bishops became untenable. Because the Irish bishops did not follow the lead of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and commission their own report, they could not pull off the graywash.

Recall that the National Conference of Catholic Bishops commissioned a graywash forty years ago that helped put us where we are today, in the 1972 report by Eugene Kennedy.   "The Catholic Priest in the United States: Psychological Investigations" claimed that two out of every three US priests were "psychologically immature." It's this same Kennedy report (also critiqued in After Asceticism) that missed the pederasty crisis which was at its peak at the time and occurring right underneath his researcher's nose. Nevertheless, the report contained not even the faintest hint of the eruption of aggressive sexual misconduct that was ongoing at the time. Indeed, in his introduction, Kennedy opines: "There is little indication that American priests would exercise freedom in any impulsive or destructive way." (p. 14) Evidently, a lot of good priests get labeled "immature" and some real scoundrels go unnoticed, or worse, were given a pass. Either way, his report was a graywash.

The current USCCB commissioned graywash will continue later this year when the folks at John Jay College release their findings on the personality characteristics of the abusive priests. No H-bombs will be dropped and the media will seize these findings to cast the honorable celibate priests as a clan of cranks and perverts, and the gay clergy as the normals.  And as is always the case with a graywash of the Church, there will be no light shed on the spiritual causes that led up to the catastrophe.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!