Dear bishops: please spare us waffling statements
Here’s a hot tip for any bishop considering a public statement on the current mess: Put some teeth in it.
If you issue a mild, dispassionate statement—hoping to keep out of controversy—you won’t just sound wimpy. You’ll sound dishonest as well. Given the facts of the matter, you shouldn’t be dispassionate. You should be mad as hell.
Regarding the Vigano testimony in particular, maybe you’re tempted to say that you just don’t know the facts. Fair enough. But you do know that some very serious charges have been made, and one way or another there’s plenty of cause for a passionate response. Deconstructing a vapid statement by Cardinal Cupich, John O’Sullivan writes for National Review:
Suppose that Vigano’s charges are false, where is the righteous anger of those unjustly accused that should animate Cupich’s words? Suppose the charges are true, on the other hand, where is the bitter shame and determination to cleanse the Augean stables?
And so, dear bishop, if you can read the Vigano statement without any emotional response, maybe it would be wiser to keep your thoughts to yourself. Otherwise we’ll know that you’re part of the problem.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!