Click here to advertise on

Boston archdiocese identifies all accused priests

Catholic World News - August 25, 2011

Bowing to demands from victim’ advocates, the Boston archdiocese has released a list of priests who have been accused of sexual abuse.

The Boston archdiocese made public an online data-base that includes the names of 159 accused priests. The list includes both living and deceased priests. The list names all those who have been found guilty of sexual abuse by civil or canonical courts. It also includes those who have only been accused, and a final determination of guilt or innocence has not yet been made--either because the accused priest has died or because the investigation is still in process. Separately, the archdiocese lists those priests who have been publicly accused but later cleared of charges.

Advocates for priests had argued against the release of such a comprehensive list, since a priest who is falsely accused could suffer grave damage to his reputation if his name is made public. But Cardinal O’Malley explained, in a letter accompanying the release of other names, that he considered the need for full disclosure an imperative.

In July, BishopAccountability, an organization dedicated to exposing clerical, complained of “a silence of epic proportions” on the part of the Boston archdiocese and released its own list of priests who had been accused but not previously identified.

The public listing released by the archdiocese does not include the names of accused priests who are members of religious orders or priests from other dioceses who were temporarily working in Boston. In those cases, Cardinal O’Malley explained, the investigation of charges is the responsibility of the other diocese or the priest’s religious superiors.

The listing also does not include the names of accused priests if the archdiocese was able to dismiss the charges promptly, and the accusations never became public. For those priests who are still facing charges, Father Richard Erickson, the vicar general of the Boston archdiocese, revealed that the archdiocese used a “low threshold” to determine whether their names should be listed, and included them if the charges were not “manifestly false.”

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our August expenses ($33,389 to go):
$35,000.00 $1,611.00
95% 5%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: GUY F. - Aug. 25, 2011 9:22 PM ET USA

    Sins that start with Bishops who did not protect the faithful.

  • Posted by: Fiducia - Aug. 25, 2011 6:40 PM ET USA

    God help our good priests, they are subject to so much abuse because of the sins of others.

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Another Month Closer to God July 31
Links to the past July 30
Fetal tissues and vaccinations; are you part of the problem? July 30
The mystery of conversion, always deeply rooted in Divine mercy July 30
Vatican delegations ought to avoid the rhetoric of the world. July 30

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days