Cardinal Wuerl's silence on Sebelius: disappointing, not surprising
The Catholic Standard, the newspaper of the Washington archdiocese, gives Georgetown University a well-deserved editorial thumping for inviting HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to speak at commencement. The Standard rightly notes that the invitation from Georgetown to Sebelius—who has taken the lead role in enforcing the noxious contraceptive mandate—is “a disappointment but not a surprise.”
It’s not a surprise, the editorial notes, because in recent years Georgetown has not shown much interest in defending Catholic teaching:
When the vision guiding university choices does not clearly reflect the light of the Gospel and authentic Catholic teaching, there are, of course, disappointing results.
The criticism is right on target, as it applies to Georgetown. But roughly the same criticisms could be raised against the publisher of the Standard, Washington’s Cardinal Donald Wuerl. If a Catholic institution in the archdiocese is failing to present authentic Catholic teaching, the archbishop should take action. If Catholic politicians living and working in the Washington archdiocese are flouting Church teachings and discipline, the archbishop should take action. But in light of his consistent failure to speak out, Cardinal Wuerl’s silence regarding the Sebelius appearance at Georgetown is… a disappointment but not a surprise.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($26,054 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Justin8110 -
May. 19, 2012 1:25 PM ET USA
Human respect is the driving force behind this sort of thing. Cardinal Wuerl, like many other prelates throughout history, have sold Christ like Judas for the empty silver of human respect and to maintain non pariah status among the secular elites. Cardinal Wuerl and in fact all of us Catholics must pray to be given the grace to not betray our Lord or His Church for something as ephemeral as the fickle praise of our fellow men.
Posted by: Savonarola -
May. 15, 2012 8:40 PM ET USA
The Dutch have their hero, William the Silent. In Washington, we have Wuerl the Silent. Yes, the dodge has been that someone else is Pelosi's bishop or Sebelius' bishop. But canon law, Can. 383, reads: "In exercising his pastoral office, the diocesan Bishop is to be solicitous for all Christ's faithful entrusted to his care, whatever their age, condition or nationality, whether they live in the territory or are visiting there...."
Posted by: lauriem5377 -
May. 15, 2012 7:59 PM ET USA
It seems a number of universities have forgotten that it's their Catholic history and Catholic identity that has forged their greatness. as current administrators and faculty (with the silence of some Bishops) seek to diminish the committment to Catholic Truth, they are setting in motion the unraveling of these great insitututions. Soon there will be little to set them apart as anything 'special'.
Posted by: John J Plick -
May. 15, 2012 1:43 PM ET USA
Sometimes I feel like I am watching a football game and at the same time listening to a knowledgeable sports commentator, but is this a sporting event or anything like it.?; Essentially not... Souls will go to Hell and others will have to struggle more desperately to attain Heaven. 1Cr 13:11 "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." Love made Paul mature. May it be likewise for us.
Posted by: extremeCatholic -
May. 14, 2012 9:23 PM ET USA
Isn't the standard dodge that Ms. Sebelius is a subject of Archbishop Naumann and not a subject of Cardinal Wuerl?
Posted by: Defender -
May. 14, 2012 6:02 PM ET USA
Bravo! Short, sweet and to the point!