Last February, we received 607 gifts, but fell short. This year we need 700. We have 8 to go—donate now!
Click here to advertise on

how did this slip past the editors?

By Diogenes (articles ) | Jan 23, 2005

The following article from the San Francisco Chronicle on yesterday's pro-life march in SF is remarkable (for the secular media) in its attempt to communicate fairly the aims and the tactics of both pro-life and pro-abortion demonstrators.

In dueling marches, about 6,000 antiabortion activists in the Walk for Life West Coast were jeered and harangued by about 3,000 advocates for abortion rights, some waving wire hangers, a symbol of the unsafe procedures women feared before abortion was legal.

Walk for Life organizers Dolores Meehan and Eva Muntean said they knew holding an anti-abortion rally in the liberal bastion of San Francisco would spark outrage. But doing so would draw the greatest exposure, Meehan said. ...

Organizers of the dueling protests had divergent strategies. The antiabortion group specifically avoided confronting its opponents, while the pro-choice contingent that lined the Embarcadero berated the larger group with insults and accused them of bringing in people from out of town to bolster its cause. ...

For the most part, the antiabortion activists ignored taunts from pro-choice marchers, smiling politely in response to jeers, flashing peace signs and singing, "God Bless America." Abortion rights advocates, however, were anything but subdued, regarding the antiabortion marchers as invaders of the city.

"Back alleys -- no more! Abortion rights for rich and poor!" many shouted. "Keep your rosaries out of my ovaries," one sign read. Some shouted obscenities.

Not perfect, but an enormous improvement on the standard tendentious treatment. Imagine the NYT or the Boston Globe deigning to report insults and obscenities from the pro-aborts. Even the accompanying photos don't appear to be doctored to the pro-lifers' disadvantage.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Progress toward our February expenses ($6,829 to go):
$35,000.00 $28,170.54
20% 80%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Novus744 - Jan. 25, 2005 11:09 PM ET USA

    Appears to me to be a win for those with common sense.

  • Posted by: Gil125 - Jan. 23, 2005 6:28 PM ET USA

    I saw only two TV accounts of the day. The one by KRON-TV (Young Broadcasting) was as fair as the Chronicle's. Imperfect but not bad. The other, on KTVU (Cox) made the "pro-abortion rights" rally (by its count 3000 people) the main story and the "anti-abortion rights" one (it counted 8000) a sidebar, at which it sneered. It reported two arrests for violence, omitting that they were both on the pro-abort side.

Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Two good publishers, six new books for Lent 11 hours ago
Another awkward 'clarification' from the Vatican February 25
Former Israeli ambassador explains how to make 'two-state solution' realistic February 25
Solidarity Campaign: Going well, thanks! And how can you help? February 25
Considering the World of Film February 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis to address Congress in joint session in September CWN - February 5