By Diogenes ( articles ) | Mar 27, 2007
The Times of London reports that Germany is implementing an old Catholic idea to counter an ancient but newly troublesome problem:
Desperate mothers are being urged to drop their unwanted babies through hatches at hospitals in an effort to halt a spate of infanticides that has shocked Germany. At least 23 babies have been killed so far this year, many of them beaten to death or strangled by their mothers before being dumped on wasteland and in dustbins.
"Selectively shockable" would seem to be the motto of the post-Christian West. Having abandoned moral absolutes (or "gotten beyond a one-size-fits-all morality," as progressives put it), the public outrage provoked by a given type of atrocity has almost nothing to do with its objective wickedness and almost everything to do with political fashions -- fashions that in turn determine which atrocities the media permit the public to view, and which they keep hidden. The same injuries, inflicted on the same creature of the same age, give rise to shock when they take place a few inches outside the uterine wall and to yawns when they take place within it. Back to the Times:
Now city councils have launched an advertising campaign to highlight the problem and to promote greater use of the Baby-Klappe hatches that allow women to drop off their babies to be found and cared for without having to give their names. Posters were being put up in cities and towns across Germany yesterday, urging women to make use of the Baby-Klappe, with the slogan "Before babies land in the rubbish bin ..."
In the context of other threats to children, OTR earlier mentioned the role of Catholic Italy's foundling hospitals in the rescue of abandoned babies. Coincidentally, the Whappers give us a photo and discussion here of a Roman specimen of the turn-table by which the swap was anonymously effected.
The Times tells us that the German campaign is opposed by Caritas and "senior clergymen" on the grounds that it will encourage baby-dumping -- presumably by women otherwise able to care for their children. That's surprising to me, but it's also a tough call to make by someone standing outside the situation. I'd be interested in how the Missionaries of Charity working with the poor in Germany would read the spin. The fact that the controversy exists at all is a sign -- however oblique -- that Europe is beginning to feel uneasy about the way in which secularism has kept its promises.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: wolfdavef3415 -
Apr. 22, 2010 8:33 PM ET USA
I presume, then, that if the FDA decides to regulate salt, as they are discussing, heads will roll?
Posted by: TheJournalist64 -
Apr. 22, 2010 7:22 PM ET USA
I'm glad somebody else noticed that the O-man was speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Now if somebody could only force him to look at the statement and tell us why the child just prior to birth is NOT an individual, and NOT entitled to bodily integrity.. .