making ends meet
By Diogenes ( articles ) | Nov 02, 2007
Let no one claim Catholic educators have lost their knack for celebrating diversity, or their innovative spirit in supplementing tuition-based income. Kentucky Catholics know better.
The principal of a Catholic high school in Bardstown received a citation from Louisville Metro Police on Halloween Eve after they allegedly spotted him dressed like a woman in an alley in the Russell neighborhood.
Paul A. Schum, 50, of the 5100 block of Maryview Drive in Louisville, was cited Tuesday for loitering with the purpose of prostitution, according to police records.
Schum, the principal at Bethlehem High School, was wearing an all black leather outfit with fishnet stockings and a pair of fake women's breasts, the records show.
Schum requested personal leave from his post at the school pending the outcome of the investigation, according to a statement yesterday from the Archdiocese of Louisville, which oversees the school. Schum denies the allegation, the statement said.
Not long ago we were told of a pastor with a failing school who threatened a sermon-strike if he didn't get the parental support he wanted. I was inclined to dismiss the stunt as an over-dramatic (and counter-productive) response to the typically straitened circumstances of family-funded Catholic ed. But perhaps the crisis is severer than I thought. Today we learn of a headmaster who pads out his salary by moonlighting as a transvestite hooker. My own high school principal part-timed as a plumber weekends and summers to raise extra household cash, yet I don't think he would have prospered had he offered his services to the community as a lady of easy virtue -- even (or do I mean especially?) with the added allure of fishnet stockings. They certainly wouldn't have helped his welding.
More judgmental readers will be quick to decry Schum's avocation as intrinsically immoral and his libido as objectively disordered. Yet we just saw that Georgetown University has given its blessing (as well as its funding) to an LGBTQ Resource Center, and on that capacious scale our creative Louisville principal scores a T and a G and, for all I know, a B and a Q as well. One can imagine Georgetown's sterner moralists tut-tutting Schum's commercial interests ("Can't you sell candy bars the old-fashioned way?"), but from their own point of view it's hard to see how the Hoyas could impugn his Catholicism. And since Washington's best and brightest can embrace all 31 flavors of sexual diversity as kosher, it's unlikely that northern Kentucky will object to his lifestyle choice.
Schum isn't out of the woods, of course. He's denied that the non-taxable income was his motive for cross-dressing and -- should the investigation fail to corroborate his claim -- he's in imminent danger of becoming the school's Vice-President for Ministry & Mission, which probably comes with an even slenderer pay-packet. All of which should encourage us to redouble our efforts in support of the "cohort model" of Catholic education, so the Schums of tomorrow can spend more time in the classroom and less time in the alleys.
Please be as generous as your means permit.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a current donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: lynnvinc7142 -
Apr. 28, 2010 10:42 AM ET USA
I know some of the climate scientists and they are good & sincere people, being haranged, hounded, and harassed for years now by climate denialists (many Exxon & Koch Industry funded). I have a good background in science, have known about the natural GH effect for 50 yrs, & have been following climate science closely for decades. Anthropogenic GW reached .05 in 1995 & has become more robust since. As a Catholic, I'm concerned that we are killing people thru AGW.
Posted by: -
Dec. 15, 2009 10:10 PM ET USA
Pope Benedict XVI (remember him?) put the question like this on December 8: "Can we remain indifferent before the problems associated with such realities as climate change, desertification, the deterioration and loss of productivity in vast agricultural areas, the pollution of rivers and aquifers, the loss of biodiversity, the increase of natural catastrophes and the deforestation of equatorial and tropical regions?"
Posted by: -
Dec. 11, 2009 8:42 PM ET USA
First we had churches voting on doctrine, now we have scientists voting on science!
Posted by: Chestertonian -
Dec. 11, 2009 8:03 PM ET USA
All the remonstrations remind me of the Wizard of Oz; lots of 'shock and awe' to divert the viewer from the reality. Remember John Adams: "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
Posted by: sparch -
Dec. 11, 2009 1:46 PM ET USA
It reminds me of all the faith put in public opinion polls that deal with issues of morality or truths. If public opinion varies from the truth, truth has somehow been changed.
Posted by: -
Dec. 11, 2009 12:30 PM ET USA
Well said. It is the integrity of the scientific method that gives assurance of truth. When that "truth" is arrived at by a concensus of the practitioners, we have a situation analogous to the Hundred Authors against Einstein. In this instance, if AGW is right, it would only take one scientist with compelling proof; not a hundred examining the swirl of data around their favorite pole.