Appeals court directs Obama administration to rewrite HHS mandate
Catholic World News - December 20, 2012
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled that the Obama administration must rewrite its controversial HHS mandate, which in its current form will compel many religious institutions, such as colleges and charitable agencies, to offer insurance coverage for contraception and sterilization beginning on August 1, 2013.
The appeals court had consolidated appeals by Belmont Abbey College (a Catholic college) and Wheaton College (an evangelical Protestant college) into one case. Lower courts had dismissed the colleges’ lawsuits because the institutions had not yet been harmed by the mandate.
During oral arguments before the appeals court, attorneys for the Obama administration asserted the administration would rewrite the HHS mandate and would not enforce it against religious institutions such as the two colleges. The appeals court stated in its ruling that the government
represented to the court that it would never enforce [the HHS mandate] in its current form against the appellants or those similarly situated as regards contraceptive services. There will, the government said, be a different rule for entities like the appellants, and we take that as a binding commitment. The government further represented that it would publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the new rule in the first quarter of 2013 and would issue a new Final Rule before August 2013.
We take the government at its word and will hold it to it … the petitioners’ lawsuits should be held in abeyance pending the new rule that the government has promised will be issued soon.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ordered, that in reliance upon the Departments’ binding representations, this court will hold these cases in abeyance, subject to regular status reports to be filed by the government with this court every 60 days from the date of this order.
The decision was written by Judges Arthur Raymond Randolph (a 1990 Bush appointee), Merrick Garland (a 1997 Clinton appointee), and Thomas Griffith (a 2005 Bush appointee).
Though there is no guarantee that revisions to the HHS mandate will be to the colleges’ satisfaction, Belmont Abbey College President William Thierfelder hailed the decision.
“Christmas came early this year,” he said. “The DC Circuit Federal Court of Appeals' ruling is a major victory for Belmont Abbey College in its challenge to the HHS mandate. The two concessions made by the government lawyers in court to never enforce the current mandate against Belmont Abbey College and to publish a proposed new rule by the end of the first quarter in 2013, are the answers to our prayers.”
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($120,151 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: unum -
Dec. 21, 2012 8:02 AM ET USA
Belmont Abbey College President William Thierfelder has little basis for celebratory remarks. While "religious institutions" may benefit from this ruling, the rest of us will be denied the freedom of religion supposedly guaranteed by our Constitution. We shouldn't be celebrating until all of us are able to practice our religion, free from unconstitutional constraints imposed by government.
Posted by: TheJournalist64 -
Dec. 20, 2012 6:25 PM ET USA
The Obamastration has shown perfidy in the past and we can expect that this is just a delaying tactic to keep the Catholic institutions off balance. But, on the whole, it's better than being thrown into the lions' den immediately.
Posted by: jacquebquique5708 -
Dec. 20, 2012 11:59 AM ET USA
It should be obvious that this is a "freedom of religion" issue. The judges were appointed by Bush (2) and Clinton (1). Just wait until the Obama appointments reach their desired level. The key is the Supreme Court. Conservatives are 5-4. It may not be that way for long. It is not about justice. It is all about socialism and the crushing of the "opiate of the people" just as in Eastern Europe.