We'll receive a $25,000 grant if others match it by Pentecost. $23,735 to go. Your gift will be doubled!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

when good news is bad news

By Diogenes (articles ) | Feb 23, 2006

Not everyone in Boston was happy when Pope Benedict announced that Archbishop O'Malley would become a cardinal.

Still it's remarkable that, on the very day of the happy announcement, a prominent civic leader in Boston would say, for the record, that he was "uncomfortable" with this honor for the archbishop, in fact "very saddened by the appointment."

Who would make such a gratuitously nasty comment? Some anti-Catholic bigot? A longtime enemy of the archbishop? A bitter critic of the Pope? No, it was Sean O'Malley.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($23,735 to go):
$25,400.00 $1,665.00
93% 7%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 10 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Laity1 - Feb. 28, 2006 10:23 AM ET USA

    Benedict Groeschel, a fellow Capuchin, stuck his neck out for O'Malley.

  • Posted by: BostonBlackey - Feb. 24, 2006 8:14 PM ET USA

    As St. Uriah said, Cuenin was not "dumped"! At least in Newton Cuenin was not poisoning the minds of the Catholic leadership of tomorrow. As I have said before, the Church in Boston is at its lowest ebb in many, many years. Cardinal Sean has closed his eyes to what is going on at Boston's un-Catholic Charities and ignored the faithful.

  • Posted by: dusty - Feb. 24, 2006 7:00 PM ET USA

    Sean O'Malley is not a member of what is today known as OFM since they dropped their official title of OFM of Leonine union. Rather he is an OFM Cap. or Capuchin Franciscan todays decendants of that Spiritual grouping whom the Conventuals or more comonly Known as OFM Conv. helped remain clear of that Papal union of splinter groups of followers of Francis.

  • Posted by: NonSumDignus - Feb. 24, 2006 6:53 PM ET USA

    The archbishop is a Capuchin (OFMCap).

  • Posted by: Pseudodionysius - Feb. 24, 2006 5:26 PM ET USA

    I think its time for those who think that this OFM is being merely faithful to his vows to review the history of the Spirituals vs the Conventuals in the Franciscan Order. Something smells here.

  • Posted by: FrPhillips - Feb. 24, 2006 2:16 PM ET USA

    I have no problem with him being "uncomfortable" with this appointment. Part of the cause of our present problems with so many bishops is because they are far TOO comfortable. But to be "saddened" by it is quite another matter, as far as I'm concerned. It would seem to me that if Peter has summoned him to this responsibility, it should be cause for joy, knowing that God, speaking through the Vicar of Christ, is calling him to an important work.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 24, 2006 12:14 PM ET USA

    He *is* humble, God bless him. But Di sees keenly between lines. Peter Meade at Catholic Charities still works at cross purposes to the Faith and disses it in the Globe. Walter Cuenin has merely taken his dissident act to academia while his poison still bubbles in Newton. All the while our bishop remains mostly out of the sight and hearing of ordinary Catholics while the battle rages around them. The Church in Boston is desperate for a clear and certain trumpet call. That was not it.

  • Posted by: Canismater - Feb. 24, 2006 11:00 AM ET USA

    It's like he's refusing to "take ownership" of his office or something...wait a minute...could he be reliving Francis' life, or authentically living Francis' rule? Wow...a religious man who has stayed faithful to his religious promises. No wonder he's upsetting so many people.

  • Posted by: - Feb. 24, 2006 9:40 AM ET USA

    He dumped the dissident Cuenin, has resolved most of the abuse lawsuits, which were simply horrible, and his personal integrity and self-effacement is a welcome contrast to Cardinal Law, a self-important criminal.

  • Posted by: Indian Catholic - Feb. 24, 2006 5:58 AM ET USA

    I think that's a good thing. The last thing we need are cardinals with an inflated sense of self-worth.

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

A silent scandal: Catholic schools promoting morally unacceptable vaccines April 24
A More Militant Church? April 24
How we'll know if the Vatican and the US hierarchy are serious about deposing negligent bishops April 24
Final take on the LCWR: A time to plant, a time to uproot April 24
With the LCWR, has the Vatican taken Gamaliel's advice? April 24

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope challenges world leaders' silence on persecution of Christians CWN - April 6
Pope outlines plans for the extraordinary jubilee of mercy CWN - April 13
Vatican completes doctrinal assessment of Leadership Conference of Women Religious CWN - April 16
Pope accepts resignation of Bishop Finn CWN - April 21