Challenge Grant: Our Boosters will match donations up to $45,000. We have $36,642 to go. Please donate!
Click here to advertise on

Brave new marriage

By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 26, 2004

If same-sex "marriage" is recognized by law, will it be possible for two heterosexuals of the same sex to get married?

Would gays object? Would John Kerry and Ted Kennedy object?

The purposes of same-sex heterosexual marriage would be private, of course. (Keep the government out of the bedrooms.) But the purposes could include obtaining tax breaks, inheritance rights, and insurance benefits.

Could a son marry his father? If not, why not?

Does marriage, as now legally understood, have something to do with sexual activity?

If the answer is Yes, then how does the government define the sorts of activity that qualify, without violating privacy rights?

If the answer is No, then why should marriage be restricted to people who have (or are presumed to have) a sexual attraction to each other?

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($124,732 to go):
$150,000.00 $25,268.34
83% 17%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: Fr. William - Mar. 29, 2004 8:02 PM ET USA

    We all know that God has already defined the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, marriage, as between a man and a woman, in a covenant that is unitive and procreative. If mankind wants to redefine marriage, & the answer to Diogenes' question is "No," as the gays/lesbians/Kennedys/Kerrys want to define it, then why should marriage be restricted to people? Why not between a woman and her pet monkey? That way, her monkey gets vet attention, with major medical benefits, and food stamps for monkey food?

  • Posted by: extremeCatholic - Mar. 26, 2004 8:56 PM ET USA

    Nonsexual persons sharing an rent-controlled apartment now commonly register for a domestic partnership so that if they split, the other will be have an unchallengeable right to remain. There are plenty of reasons to get a DP. It's all benefits without costs. (i.e. there is no marriage income tax penalty.) Since a common address at the time of application for a DP is the only requirement, there will be a lot of pressure to extend DP's beyond 2 to all who share the address.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Could respect for the papacy mean resisting the Pope? 6 hours ago
The Church Moves On, Slowly October 24
Is Cardinal Kasper losing his grip? October 24
The Pope is not the problem October 23
Do not confuse sacramental discipline and Catholic doctrine. October 23

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Cardinal Parolin: UN must protect innocents from Islamic State CWN - September 30
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6