Brave new marriage
By Diogenes (articles ) | Mar 26, 2004
If same-sex "marriage" is recognized by law, will it be possible for two heterosexuals of the same sex to get married?
Would gays object? Would John Kerry and Ted Kennedy object?
The purposes of same-sex heterosexual marriage would be private, of course. (Keep the government out of the bedrooms.) But the purposes could include obtaining tax breaks, inheritance rights, and insurance benefits.
Could a son marry his father? If not, why not?
Does marriage, as now legally understood, have something to do with sexual activity?
If the answer is Yes, then how does the government define the sorts of activity that qualify, without violating privacy rights?
If the answer is No, then why should marriage be restricted to people who have (or are presumed to have) a sexual attraction to each other?
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($5,330 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Fr. William -
Mar. 29, 2004 8:02 PM ET USA
We all know that God has already defined the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, marriage, as between a man and a woman, in a covenant that is unitive and procreative. If mankind wants to redefine marriage, & the answer to Diogenes' question is "No," as the gays/lesbians/Kennedys/Kerrys want to define it, then why should marriage be restricted to people? Why not between a woman and her pet monkey? That way, her monkey gets vet attention, with major medical benefits, and food stamps for monkey food?
Posted by: extremeCatholic -
Mar. 26, 2004 8:56 PM ET USA
Nonsexual persons sharing an rent-controlled apartment now commonly register for a domestic partnership so that if they split, the other will be have an unchallengeable right to remain. There are plenty of reasons to get a DP. It's all benefits without costs. (i.e. there is no marriage income tax penalty.) Since a common address at the time of application for a DP is the only requirement, there will be a lot of pressure to extend DP's beyond 2 to all who share the address.