Pentecost (today) is the last day of our Spring Campaign. Please be generous.
Click here to advertise on

the stealth nominee

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles ) | Jul 25, 2005

He's 50 years old, bright, ambitious, and prominent. He's said to be a man of principle, living in the middle of a culture war. Yet he apparently has no enemies. That's curious, isn't it?

No, I'm not ready to panic. There's no evidence that would cause panic. Nor is there evidence that encourages confidence. Yet:

OK, now I'm worried.

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 5 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: The OX - Jul. 26, 2005 6:37 AM ET USA

    I checked with ABA office in Chicago. Roni stated that John G. Roberts is NOT a member of ABA. ABA is pro-abortion. American Bar Assoc. 321 N. Clark Street Chicago, IL 60610 312.988.5000 Roni Let's put the pressure on American Medical Assoc. re: WHEN LIFE BEGINS. Their neutral position won't hold up. Then revisit Roe V Wade. Take WHEN LIFE BEGINS out of the hands of American Bar Assoc. As long as it's legal changing hearts ???? Dump RC's Leahy, Kennedy, Durbin, Biden.

  • Posted by: - Jul. 26, 2005 1:17 AM ET USA

    Well, at least we can hope it is the Holy Spirit confounding our enemies....

  • Posted by: - Jul. 25, 2005 7:38 PM ET USA

    I think both of the comments are correct. Every one of the liberal types including Senator White Sheet Byrd have qualified their approval by saying something like "as long as nothing damaging comes out". I think they are submitting to the inevitable here. Oh by the way, Anita Hill never worked for Judge Roberts did she?

  • Posted by: Eleazar - Jul. 25, 2005 11:54 AM ET USA

    With all respect and humility, I think you’re both wrong. The “calculating types” are biding their time while their attack dogs, (, ACLU, et al) are furiously trying to dig up the dirt on Judge Roberts. If they can find or fabricate something, you’ll see the whole lot start to yowl like hormone-besotted cats.

  • Posted by: - Jul. 25, 2005 9:14 AM ET USA

    Phil, you're drawing the wrong inference. Hillary and the MSM are worried, but they know there is nothing they can do. Their opposition on Roberts will just make them look silly and extremist. These calculating types have already decided that they lost the battle on Roberts. Better to make the most out of the situation, look reasonable, and then maybe they'll regain some credibility so they can obstruct the next nominee (who may not be as handsome or as bright).

Matching Campaign
Subscribe for free
Click here to advertise on
Shop Amazon

Recent Catholic Commentary

Urgent! We need extra financial support between now and May 24th. May 22
What's wrong with these pictures? May 22
What can we learn from the dignity of military services? May 22
Was Lewis “basically Catholic”? May 21
Reading The Diary of a Country Priest: Scandal May 20

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days