Our Boosters are matching gifts up to $45,000. We have $33,972 to go. Your gift today will count twice!
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Arguing from faith

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles ) | May 01, 2003

All perfectly true; Santorum did not make a "religious" argument.

But just for the sake of the discussion, suppose someone did introduce a political argument based solely on religious belief. Why should such an argument be excluded from public debates? We accept arguments based on self-interest, historical analysis, or (allegedly) scientific reasoning; why should we be willing to accept any basis for argument except religious belief?

Obviously someone who asserts a political position based on a religious doctrine cannot expect other citizens, who do not share his faith, to accept his position on the basis of religious authority alone. He'll have to make a logical, secular argument for his position.

I live in a town where a substantial minority of the residents belong to a religious sect (Seventh-Day Adventist) that opposes the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Until recently, this was a "dry" town; alchohol sales were banned. During a town-meeting debate on allowing alchohol sales, I sided with the Adventists-- not because I share their faith or their distaste for alcohol, but because I saw other persuasive reasons to continue the ban (to wit, the secondary costs that alchohol sales would likely impose on the community, mostly involving extra work for the police). It was clear that many people, in seeking to continue the ban, were motivated primarily by religious beliefs. But if their arguments were persuasive to a non-believer, why question their motivation?

My point here is that many people-- Richard Cohen, for instance-- seem anxious to impugn the motivations of any public actors who might be acting on the basis of religious belief. That's intolerance of a particularly nasty sort; it is, in effect, an attempt to impose a "religious test" on public officials-- an imposition that is specifically barred by the US Constitution. (The "religious test" in this case, of course, is passed only by those who show no particular interest in religion.)

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our year-end goal ($120,151 to go):
$150,000.00 $29,848.98
80% 20%
Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

Fall 2014 Campaign
Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on CatholicCulture.org

Recent Catholic Commentary

And here's another very old story: the secular media don't understand Catholic affairs 18 hours ago
How not to be persuasive 19 hours ago
Francis the Man, Francis the Pope October 28
Clarifying what it might mean for a pope to wish to change Catholic doctrine October 28
Does the Kasper Proposal make Pope Francis a heretic? Invalid marriages and mortal sin October 28

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Key synod report calls for 'gradualism' in Church response to irregular family situations CWN - October 13
As synod concludes, bishops issue message, approve document; Pope weighs in CWN - October 20
Synod of Bishops opens with Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica CWN - October 6