Critical need by 8/31:   $10,000 to cover a crippling immediate shortfall.   $4,850 to go.   Please help now!
Click here to advertise on

What did the police know, and when did they know it?

By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - email) | Mar 16, 2010

In Ireland Cardinal Sean Brady is under heavy criticism-- justified, in my view-- for having failed to notify law-enforcement officials about reports that a priest was abusing children. The priest, Father Brendan Smyth, went on to become a notorious predator, was eventually convicted, and died in prison. If he had been reported to police earlier, perhaps many children could have been spared from a traumatic experience. 

But today's news brings an interesting wrinkle in the case: Police have been aware for years that Cardinal Brady heard those initial reports back in the 1970s. Police knew that the future cardinal-- who was then a priest and canon lawyer, investigating the case on behalf of the local bishop-- made a thorough report to Church officials, but did not alert civic officials. Knowing what he had done, did the police press charges against Cardinal Brady? No. Did they denounce him? No. The police did what the cardinal himself had done; they kept quiet.

The case is interesting because in more than a few abuse cases in the US, police had some early evidence that a priest was molesting children. When bishops sought to cover up the evidence in those cases, they needed cooperation from local police, and they got it. 

The fact that some police officials were involved in cover-ups does not justify the bishops' involvement. It does, however, point to the fact that Church officials were not the only people guilty of silence in the face of an outrage. 

An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:

Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach seven million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!

Our Spring Challenge Grant
Progress toward our Spring Challenge Grant goal ($15,164 to go):
$35,000.00 $19,836.18
43% 57%
Sound Off! supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

Show 2 Comments? (Hidden)Hide Comments
  • Posted by: williiam ronner - Mar. 16, 2010 10:56 PM ET USA

    Unfortunately, police officers sometimes put their loyalty to the Church and her priests first. Also, as a practicing Catholic and retired police officer, I would have been hesitant to arrest a priest as, in my very fallible state, I would have found it difficult to believe priests were engaging in this behavior.

  • Posted by: Frodo1945 - Mar. 16, 2010 9:26 PM ET USA

    Yeh, that argument that my friends were doing it too never got me anywhere with my parents. Maybe someday the Bishops will really 'get it' although I am not too hopeful. I think we'll most likely have to endure until they pass on.

Subscribe for free
Shop Amazon
Click here to advertise on

Recent Catholic Commentary

Church Fathers: The Third Century and the School of Alexandria 24 hours ago
Every Aspect of the Catholic Thing August 28
News Posturing: How the dramatis personae use each other August 28
The intractable practical problems with the Kasper proposal August 28
No, the Pope did not endorse a gay-friendly children's book August 28

Top Catholic News

Most Important Stories of the Last 30 Days
Pope Francis: welcome with compassion those who have remarried outside the Church CWN - August 5