The ethics of adultery
By Phil Lawler (bio - articles - send a comment) | November 12, 2012 5:08 PM
Perhaps you’ve seen the speculation that an anonymous writer who asked for advice from the resident ethicist at the New York Times some weeks ago was the man cuckolded by General Petraeus. The situation described by this unhappy man does fit the facts of the case.
The anonymous correspondent wondered whether he should blow the whistle on his adulterous wife and her famous lover. The Times ethicist replied in part:
Don’t expose the affair in any high-profile way. It would be different if this man’s project was promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. The only motive for exposing the relationship would be to humiliate him and your wife, and that’s never a good reason for doing anything.
Never a good reason? Well, hardly ever. The Times expert seems to think that it would be fine to humiliate a government official who was promoting “family values.” As Wesley Smith points out on National Review: “To liberals, destroying social conservatism is always the highest ethical principle.”
|
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus: Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you! |
Easter Campaign: Progress toward our Spring 2013 goal ($33,066 to go):
$80,000.00
$46,933.77
41%
59%
|
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
