Canonized saints who exemplify the vocation of marriage are hard to come by. There are two reasons for this, one intrinsic to the married state, the other political. These two reasons raise the question of whether those of us who are married require saints who were married to be our guides.
The first reason there are so few married saints is intrinsic to marriage and family. The very nature of the vocation to marriage places the sphere of holiness around hearth and home where it remains largely invisible to the public. Priests are called to minister to a larger community, to preach, and to direct souls. Religious sometimes share in this mission or they may work in public services such as those provided by schools and hospitals. At the very least their holiness is manifest in their communities.
Even those called to the single state are oriented ad extra, toward service that is in some way public, and perhaps toward new foundations and enterprises that will make their mark on the world. But the ministry of the married is primarily to their own families. To the degree that spouse and children are the object of the married person's holiness, the sanctity of married persons will be little known outside a very small circle. And to the degree that a husband or wife achieves a more public holiness, especially in the absence of children or after the children are grown, their achievements, however laudable, are not precisely grounded in the marital vocation.
Lobbying for Saints
This becomes doubly significant when one considers the political nature of canonizations. To be canonized, a saint not only needs to be known but needs to have a lobby, an organization vigorously promoting the cause. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with this; it is the necessary propulsion along every road to formal recognition. Here again, priests and religious have a significant advantage. The diocese or religious order in which a saint has risen to prominence has a strong interest in advancing that saint's cause and a ready-made organization for pursuing it.
It is no surprise, then, that so few married people have been canonized. Undoubtedly, of course, there are many more souls in heaven who were married than were priests or religious. The sheer numeric mismatch among these vocations is staggering. But we're talking here about canonized saints. We have little ability to know or promote the holiness of couples who have found their sanctification, as they are supposed to do, in the fulfillment of their wedding vows.
Does the lack of married models seriously hamper the quest for holiness among those called to marriage? I don't think so. The genius of sanctity does not consist in the specific works one performs, the public impact one makes, or even the specific vocation to which one is called. These are all simply means to the same end, union with God. When we read the lives of the saints, we may find their external achievements fascinating and even instructive, but what we are really trying to imitate is their interior achievements.
The interior life of the saint colors everything he or she does. The spirit of a Saint Francis de Sales or a Thérèse of Lisieux would have kept them conformed to God's will no matter what their circumstances. In reading the lives of the saints we are not so much trying to figure out which of their external activities to imitate as to see what made them tick, to see God at work in them. The goal is not the learning of a set of tasks but the transformation of self.
We can get practical advice about how to make our marriages stronger from many different sources. The purpose of canonized saints is to fire us with a love of God which will infuse and elevate everyting we do. So, yes, married canonized saints are hard to come by. But it doesn't really matter, and it is certainly no excuse.
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!