Theologian sees irrational approach among some Catholic religious-education teachers
CWN - July 20, 2012
Writing for The Catholic Thing, Francis Beckwith coins a new term, “egopapism,” to describe the attitude displayed by Arlington diocese religious-education instructors who refused to take an oath of fidelity.
When they argue that Christians should be guided by their own consciences, without admitting the need for expert guidance and authoritative judgment, those teachers embrace “an anti-intellectual and fundamentally irrational position.” Unfortunately, Beckwith reflects, that unserious approach to religious instruction is all too common in the Church. Beckwith—who became one of America’s leading Evangelical Protestant theologians before returning to the Catholic faith—relates:
As I noted in my 2009 memoir, Return to Rome, the lack of theological seriousness that flowed from this agenda is what pushed me and many others into the arms of Evangelical Protestantism.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Our Fall Campaign
Progress toward our final 2013 goal ($21,143 to go, assuming receipt of matching funds):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: Randal Mandock -
Jul. 20, 2012 4:13 PM ET USA
"Egopapism?" How about "_anti_papism!" For years I have been referring to my catechists as "papist" because of the allegiance we swear to all papal directives. The "anti-intellectual and fundamentally irrational" catechesis that I was expected to deliver in the 1990s is one of the aberrations that pushed me and others into our FSSP parish. Among other problems, my most serious one now is monitoring instruction to make certain that it remains free of certain SSPX anti-Vatican II influences.
Posted by: Defender -
Jul. 20, 2012 3:23 PM ET USA
Five catechists out of 5000 who didn't sign and caused this stink? Really? Show 'em the door and move on. My experience, however, suggests that quite a few more should have signed the document and this doesn't include those in the administration of the diocese (or any diocese, for that matter)- this includes those who don't know the Faith at all and are contend with having students color drawings and other mindless exercises for Religion class.