the enemy of my enemies
By Diogenes (articles ) | August 20, 2010 4:17 PM
To be honest with you, I couldn’t get worked up about Bill Donohue’s campaign to persuade the owners of the Empire State Building to light up the tower on the 100th anniversary of Mother Teresa’s birth.
Yes, it would be nice if the Empire State Building honored Mother Teresa. But if the owners continue to refuse? Outside of Manhattan—and New Yorkers sometimes need to be reminded that there is a world outside Manhattan—no one will know, one way or another. I’m sure Mother Teresa herself doesn’t care. When you’re living in the glow of divine light, the electric kind isn’t likely to produce much excitement.
But if I’m puzzled by Donohue’s insistence on this issue, I’m absolutely flummoxed by the effort by a group of radical-left Catholic organizations to persuade the Empire State Building management not to turn on the lights. Indifference to the issue is quite understandable; there are lots of other more pressing issues on the public agenda. But active opposition to the Catholic League’s campaign—from people who describe themselves as Catholics-- is truly astonishing. This bears investigation.
First let’s take a look at the list of groups that joined in condemning Donohue’s drive:
- Catholics for Choice
- Call to Action
- Chicago Women-Choice
- National Coalition of American Nuns
- New Ways Ministry
- Roman Catholic Womenpriests—USA
- Take Back Our Church
- Women's Alliance for Theology, Ethics and Ritual
- Women's Ordination Conference
This is no ordinary list of Catholic organizations. These are groups that have been officially denounced by the Catholic hierarchy, groups led by people who have incurred formal excommunication, groups dedicated to the promotion of causes that the Church condemns.
Now look at the text of the letter they wrote to the Empire State Building’s management. They aren’t actually arguing against turning on the lights for Mother Teresa; they’re arguing against turning on the lights for Bill Donohue. The groups condemn him as “an attack dog for the radical right, helping to promote its misogynist and homophobic agenda.”
Ah, now I understand. If Bill Donohue wins, these groups lose. And now for the first time, I feel myself getting excited about his light-up-the-Empire-State-Building campaign.
An appeal from our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Mirus:
Dear reader: If you found the information on this page helpful in your pursuit of a better Catholic life, please support our work with a donation. Your donation will help us reach five million Truth-seeking readers worldwide this year. Thank you!
Progress toward our June expenses ($15,085 to go):
All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!
Posted by: normnuke -
Aug. 22, 2010 7:13 PM ET USA
It might be helpful to note that, as featured in Drudge, the Empire State Building has, since refusing to honor Mother Teresa, been infested with bedbugs. What does that tell us about the hygiene practices of the members of the groups listed above?
Posted by: jflare293129 -
Aug. 20, 2010 11:52 PM ET USA
What would these people say if I told them that they do not represent me, a Catholic, now, nor have they ever? I actually take serious offense that they'd think I want to be like them. Perhaps I'd be a tad more sympathetic to their ideas if they'd at least acknowledged virtue in mine? If anyone's taking a vote, I'll take Mr. Donohue's attitude over their's any day. I hate being presented as a modern, intolerant fool....
Posted by: Defender -
Aug. 20, 2010 7:51 PM ET USA
And they lit up the building for communist China, etc, but not for Mother Teresa...